PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Can TAF's visibility replace RVR?
View Single Post
Old 18th Jun 2020, 06:11
  #29 (permalink)  
FlightDetent

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
For reference only, EASA starting point is CAT.OP.MPA.185 Planning minima for IFR flights — aeroplanes. Then it follows to CAT.OP.MPA.110.

If, A conversion from meteorological visibility to RVR/CMV should not be used .... for any RVR minima less than 800 m. [AMC 10 (a)(3)]
and by definition any TAF will only have VIS
then anywhere CAT I is required, RVR 550 must be disregarded and VIS 800 used.

That's different from sonic's suggestion. Thoughts?
point 3) in intended after a conversion i.e. with a Vis of 400 m and a conversion factor of 2.0 you would get a CMV of 800m, but with, let's say a min RVR of 550 you could not do the conversion with a Visibility of, let's say 300m.
this leaves me perplexed.
FlightDetent is offline