PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Boeing Considers Developing a 757-PLUS Instead of New Mid-Market-Airplane Dubbed 797
Old 12th May 2020, 03:10
  #46 (permalink)  
Anti Skid On
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: ex EGNM, now NZRO
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tdracer
Not sure about it being bollocks - particularly this bit:

I think this is what really hurt the 757-300 - it was simply too long for a single aisle. This made turn times horrible, and on-board service a nightmare - I sat near the back of a 757-300 one time, after we landed I timed it - it took 10 minutes after the door opened before there was even movement where I was sitting (I flew trans-Atlantic on a DC8-60 way back when - it had the same problem).
Direct operating costs per seat mile for the -300 were good, but it took so long to turn that it took a serious hit for productivity. Single aisle becomes problematic when you get much over 200 seats - twin aisle simply works better when you get much above 200 seats.
I think you missed one little aspect; I once travelled on an A319 operated by Air Canada, with atrocious seat pitch. At one point the queue for the toilets, both at the rear, was 50% the way down the aisle. Had the seat pitch allowed 20 less seats this issue would have been better. Post Covid will be see better seating? Here's hoping
Anti Skid On is offline