Originally Posted by
myturn
That is my point making the 200 number way off the mark?
I think by every metric it is way off the mark based on all the communications. For all sorts of reasons 200 is on the mark, for Jet, at this stage.
I don't think anyone is under the illusion that in a situation that is out of our control there will only ever be one wave of redundancies. Certainly I think everyone hopes there are the absolute minimum.
But Air New Zealand isn't planning to be 70% smaller in 12 months time.