Originally Posted by
Lead Balloon
What, precisely, is the administrative decision in respect of which Glen is entitled to reasons under the ADJR Act?
A decision to reallocate CMTs is not an administrative decision to which the ADJR Act is subject. Someone in CASA deciding to interpret a rule differently than someone else in CASA interprets it is not a decision to which the ADJR Act is subject. Someone in CASA deciding to tell someone they can’t employ Glen is not a decision to which the ADJR Act applies.
Glen has to apply for some certificate or licence or approval that CASA can grant him and be refused it. That’s a decision to which the ADJR Act applies.
Glen, without malice or self opinion, I suggest you read Lead Balloon’s post slowly and piece by piece. This is a person who very accutely understand CASA, legal interpretation and what an ‘Act’ is and how it is applie, particularly in reference to CASA’s process of CMT’s. CMT’s are not a regulatory extension of the Act. They are just a pithy little process that CASA uses to, in part, enforce rules and regulations. Just a tool in their bag of goods, nothing more and nothing less. A process, and as it turns out, a crappy one at that, and one they are ditching after 10 years of experimenting ting with it.
It will take a smart legal team and a lot of money to outwit, outlast and outplay one Jonathan Aleck.