Originally Posted by
Spooky 2
Maybe I missed it earlier, but was this flight being conducted under pure Part 91, or was it a Part 135 operation?
I've had the same question, perhaps it will be answered in one of the NTSB briefings soon.
Originally Posted by
Airbubba
Would this be a part 135 operation? Or is there some part 91 'cost sharing' scheme that may have been used to skirt the regs? This seems to be a recurring theme in these small aircraft charter crashes.