PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - MAX’s Return Delayed by FAA Reevaluation of 737 Safety Procedures Mk II
Old 25th Dec 2019, 22:08
  #250 (permalink)  
568
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Castletown
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LowObservable
Discussion of control forces makes me think about the second level of MCAS, where the authority was increased. Theory follows:

The stabilizer can overpower the elevators, as we know. It can also move into a position where the pilots physically cannot pull hard enough to get the required elevator deflection, or wind back the nose-down trim.

So while MCAS was originally designed to smooth out a bump or dip in the stick-force-to-alpha gradient, it evolved into a system that can block the controls and prevent the aircraft from entering a certain corner of the envelope. In short, a full-authority envelope-protection system.

And that's why a single-channel system was a disaster, and why a dual or pseudo-triplex system can't be certificated.
Excellent narrative."In short, a full-authority envelope-protection system".Which could also be meant to mean "anti-stall system", which is why Boeing went out of their way to dispense with the anti-stall verbiage.

Last edited by 568; 25th Dec 2019 at 22:08. Reason: text
568 is offline