Senate Submission Review
Sunfish, you make a valid point, and it does fit in with the terms of reference.
For clarity. APTA was established as a "cooperative" if you like. Its Mission Statement was very clearly to increase safety, increase regulatory compliance, increase jobs with an emphasis on rural areas, and to provide subsidised support to regional based aero clubs that were operating primarily for altruistic reasons, rather than the commercial return. It was a very significant investment to get the suitable systems, procedures, and personnel in place, and was designed with CASA, formally approved by CASA, audited by CASA, and even recommended by CASA.
The Terms of Reference mention;
"whether the current legislation is fit for purpose"
"the safety and economic impacts"
"long term social and economic impacts of CASA decisions on small business, agricultural operations, and individuals.....'
"CASAs maintenance of an efficient and sustainable Australian aviation industry ...including training..."
"the efficacy of its engagement with the aviation sector" etc etc
Whoever wrote those terms of reference has certainly come off of a good base line. They "get it"
This thread most certainly will be my submission. I will submit it at the appropriate time.
Considered, well intentioned comments by Pprune contributors are always highly valued, but perhaps more so now.