Originally Posted by
parkfell
Perhaps the lawyers can say whether Judicial Review is ever an option when the CAA responses are less then satisfactory?
Or any other legal routes ~ EU direction....?
Thanks again.
It's more about being able to enact an appropriate treatment plan than lawyers, at the moment.
It has crossed my mind about liability for losses, if you tell them what your Doctor advises, have the treatment, and then they only tell you the consequences AFTER you have been treated. Who's 'fault' would that be?? I have already told them in writing that I can't be expected to follow guidance they refuse to give.
The reply?
None.