ixixly
Absolutely I concur. I may not have made my view clear, but the issue is somewhat important to me.
Nothing is proven until a fair process has been conducted. Businesses, and peoples livelihoods can be destroyed in a moment, in this day and age. I have heard all the stories, and if proven, the due processes will be followed. But quite simply, it is an article at this stage.
At the moment the allegations I believe have stemmed from an article in the Australian. That alone, shouldn't be able to destroy a business. I am sure the Owners interest is to move out of the area of speculation, and into a more factual arena ASAP. The outcome of that, is what a business should live or die on, in my opinion.
Presumption of innocence until proven guilty. Its important. It really is.
The entire aviation industry needs to operate in that environment, if we expect growth and investment. There needs to be stability.
Trust in fair processes. For clarification, I aint blindly leaping to anyones defence, remember it was me that sacked him. Be mindful, its not a business model that appeals to me or most flying school owners, but that doesn't mean its wrong.
A fair and controlled process is what needs to happen, with opportunities to demonstrate good intent, and improve. That's the first step, in getting confidence into the industry.
Sorry folk, I don't want to get too controversial, Ive got my hands full somewhere else....