View Single Post
Old 25th Sep 2019, 09:14
  #10590 (permalink)  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 19,426
I thought the ruling was that the issue with him wasn't the act of actually proroguing Parliament, simply the length of time he chose as being unjustifiable..
Therefore the act is legal if the length is justifiable, and until we had the ruling no one knew what a reasonable time was.. Therefore until the ruling he was acting within the law as it was.
NutLoose is online now