Originally Posted by
Torres
To clarify, whilst Uzu Air's AOC was restored and they were awarded one of the first "low capacity RPT" AOC's by the Director of CASA personally at Horn Island, 66 days grounding and the loss of over $300,000 took their toll and the company was eventually voluntarily wound up for financial reasons. (Even then, vindictive forces within CASA tried to embarrass the Director for "taking control of an aircraft", a totally fallacious accusation).
Does that mean that in the aforementioned case, UZU was only trying to get the AOC restored but didn't sue for financial loss ensuing from the wrongfully withdrawn certificate? It feels very inadequate a judgment in UZU's favour if it wasn't accompanied by financial reparations for the shortfall incurred to be made.