Originally Posted by
Hawker400
I guess at some point we will arrive at Schrodinger's pilot.
He is bad enough to test the system, but testing the system makes him a better pilot.
At which point is his analysis still valid?
That's not really Schroedinger - that would be a pilot with both extreme skills and no skills at all who'd only crystalise into one state when faced with an emergency
I think you have Heissenberg down pat, though - no observation is perfectly accurate as the observation itself will change the observed.