Originally Posted by
Ethel the Aardvark
Its not about wanting to fly one Office. It’s about CASA having many days to write the instrument and I believe it contradicts with EASA and CASA ‘s own media page.
Ethel,
Isn't that what you would expect from CASA.
Seriously, let's hope it is rapidly established that the problem was a mistake by jumpers, and not a fundamental structural problem with the aeroplane ---- the latter would really play into CASA's hands, and most likely be the end of the GA-8 and the company.
The history of CASA (and predecessors) treatment of Gippsland Aeronautics does not inspire confidence.
Tootle pip!!