PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - MAX’s Return Delayed by FAA Reevaluation of 737 Safety Procedures
Old 7th Jun 2019, 05:09
  #207 (permalink)  
tdracer
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,395
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
That's certainly true of the Max 8/9 compared to the -800/-900.

I'm not sure sure that it holds for the bigger and heavier Max 10, for which there is of course no NG equivalent.
The -10 will be longer - which gives a better moment arm for the tail. So the -10 can have more thrust than a -9, which can have more thrust than a -8 (for the same reason).

Smythe, high/hot is a different issue - the airframe can still handle as much thrust at an equivalent IAS, but the engine may not be capable of producing as much thrust in the thinner and/or hotter air (without exceeding a limit - usually EGT - but other issues can come into play). If the engine is effectively derated for the baseline sea level operation, increasing high/hot thrust is relatively easy since the engine already has unused margin.
tdracer is offline