How we talk about climate change is rapidly shifting as the ramifications of unchecked carbon pollution become ever clearer.
The Guardian sped that shift along last week, when it updated its style guide to encourage reporters to refer to climate change as a “climate emergency, crisis or breakdown” and using “global heating” in lieu of global warming.
The outlet is a leading voice on climate coverage, meaning the move is more than symbolic. The new language could have lasting impacts on readers and how they perceive climate change, and inspire others to make similar shifts in how they talk about climate change. And with a million species
at risk of extinction and a decade of rising carbon emissions
turning up the broiler on the plane, describing our situation as “crisis” feels inspired. At the same time,
the Guardian’s word choice has the potential to alienate some readers, further locking in gridlock.
The above is about a week old. I wonder if the emotive and choreographed language surrounding this subject is having an adverse effect on the mental health of our teenagers. Immature and irresponsible but I guess it sells newspapers.