PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Glad this story hasn't been forgotten
View Single Post
Old 9th Apr 2019, 02:07
  #4 (permalink)  
WingNut60
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Perth, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Age: 71
Posts: 885
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
I have no vested interest in this topic, very little knowledge and will (provided I am not unduly goaded) make only this one post.
I will qualify it now with my strongest empathy for anyone afflicted with illness, whatever the source. Being ill is not nice.
It is especially not nice when it is serious / chronic illness and results in incapacitation and death.

However, now I will put on my devil's advocate horns and the first of two obvious questions.
  1. What does the science say?
    I ask this with only the knowledge that the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee investigation put forward a negative finding and their 2008 follow up review affirmed that finding.
    I can guess that many here feel that to not be the full story.
  2. What makes the aerotoxicity question philosophically different to the anti-vax arguments?
I am genuinely interested to hear level and measured opinions on this topic.

Last edited by WingNut60; 9th Apr 2019 at 02:18.
WingNut60 is offline