Originally Posted by
bingofuel
Do these convictions now mean that the airport authority, airlines and passengers inconvenienced can sue these people for any losses or costs incurred due to their behaviour?
I'd at least hope it was grounds for them all to be banned from entering any UK airport or being within 500 meters of one for a considerable amount of time. That ban would also apply to UK airlines.
However I suspect someone would find that would go agasint their human rights. I am all for human rights, but long as Thier life is not endangered by banning them from somewhere then I don't see any controversy. No one could argue their life would be at risk from being banned from using a UK airport.