Originally Posted by
Derfred
As you would well know, there was an extensive study over a decade ago involving crew members wearing wrist monitoring devices, maintaining logs, and even conducting simulator sessons immediately after long-range ops to assess their fatigue-affected competency. It involved a lot of volunteer work from pilots and was conducted with the leading Australian sleep institute at Adelaide University.
When the report came out, it presumably contained answers that the Company did not like, and apparently even the Mafia would have been impressed at how quickly, quietly and deeply the report was buried - never to be seen again.
So, does anyone wonder why they are a little short on volunteers for this latest “study”?
"One only launches an enquiry when one knows the answer in advance"
There may well be a 'study'. Presumably the data is
being collected and the sample parameters set by a reputable third party that create a valid data sample from which statistical inferences can be drawn that are VALID.
As Mr Derfred explains there is an ocean of difference between the Adelaide Sleep Institute conducted study and a
company study, that surprisingly is 'short of volunteers'.
Could you please enlighten us as to which firm the company and presumably your representatives, have contracted to independently collect, collate and interpret that data?