PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Weiner's Laws
Thread: Weiner's Laws
View Single Post
Old 21st Jan 2019, 13:57
  #8 (permalink)  
Ian W
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Not Long Now
"There is a possibility that one aircraft may not follow the agreed trajectory, but that will be alerted to the controller by conformance monitoring software which will display the trajectory the aircraft should be following and often the vectors to put the aircraft back onto the trajectory. All this with backup from ACASx that will provide efficient avoidance based on aircraft capabilities should the controller/system not separate the aircraft."

Thanks Ian. My point, although slightly muddled I admit, is that if you are to rely on an automated system, rely on it. What is the point of the 'controller' if the system monitors conformance, and provides remedy to non conformance? Surely it would be better, and a lot quicker if multiple 'instructions' are needed to remedy a situation, to simply remove the controller and send all messages by CPDLC/datalink whatever? It seems to me we are allowing reliance on automation, as long as a human has a veto at the crunch time, which seems to place a lot of faith in the ability of said human, and be contradictory to the initial premise that automation can do it, and probably better..,
These are areas that are slowly being implemented and not 'operational' as yet although the capabilities are all available it is useful to have operators aware of the implications of the automation. You ask "what is the point of the controller"; The intent is to allow the controller to make a different decision if necessary than the automatics might, so instead of return to the trajectory a new track or altitude may be sensible - and expect that to be negotiated with the flight crew using data link also. It also allows the controller to decide that a particular aircraft for whatever reason is not reliably following a trajectory so will get ground vectors instead. In most foreseen implementations the controllers could start acting as arbitrators when automated systems for whatever reason cannot come to a clear resolution of an issue. The free route airspace in Europe and the efficiencies available to the airlines if they want to take advantage of them, are just the start of a process happening worldwide.
Ian W is offline