Originally Posted by
DaveReidUK
The report from the Saudi AIB can, of course, be relied upon to tell the true story.
It is difficut to tell whether DR is being facetious or not here.
I read the report as a pretty comprehensive document and would be interested to hear if anyone has identified faults, omissions or other caused for concern. Much detail was provided by manufacturer and UK forensic labs and reported presumably fully. The manufactureer or other agencies would have had something to say had their reports been cherry-picked.
All reports from witnesses agree in all major details.
Ther is no evidence whatsoever of the alleged King's aircraft causing movement delays as reports from aircraft deperting ahead of 163's landing make no mention of it and surely wuld hve to ave done were this the case.
If people do have concerns about this report please, what are they?