Originally Posted by
Sunfish
Meaningless waffle Luke. My point is that CASA and you, refuse to apply international standards, the most important being a refusal to apply risk management approach to regulation.
CASA even has a report on the subject but refuses to apply it.
https://www.casa.gov.au/file/149106/...token=WVqD2Yb0
To put it simply, do the calculations for the benefit in dollar terms of the current medical regime versus the horrendous cost to the community of its application.
Sunfish,
Well Said.
But it should be read and understood as a consequence of Bruce Byron's
Directive 1 of 2007. ie: Part of the implementation of Directive 1 of 2007.
Once the system got rid of Byron and Vaughan, all this CBA nonsense (ie; complying with Government directives and the diktats of the Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR) was dropped like a hot brick.
Interestingly, one of the exercises done "back in the day", was to apply the then AS/NZ for Risk Management to a big swodge of "maintenance" rules ----- the result was most interesting, about 80% of the those rules would have been reduced to advisory material or dropped altogether , on the basis they were normal or standard trade practice.
Tootle pip!!