Originally Posted by
Organfreak
Another of hundreds of speculative posts: It appears that their (Boeing and FAA) idea of what most pilots would do in such a situation was over-optimistic, a product of wishful thinking.
What does that leave us with?
Should the training be mandated by the FAA against assumptions and is it affordable in time/cost?
It would seem that when an operator chooses to operate an airplane they are the one that assumes that their specified training is good enough. If you expect Airbus and Boeing etal. to accept risk then you must sign this off somehow.