View Single Post
Old 16th Oct 2003, 15:31
  #177 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 30

BIK says;

...the Big Sky Theory will always be the first line of defence. Even if you funnel all the traffic into the same few flight levels and down the same few airway routes there is still an extremely high probability that there will not be a collision.
and later

I’ve never been a big advocate of “see and avoid”.
No, just the big sky theory it seems.

So what do you advocate then? Minimal or no communication and a reliance on the BST?

Your ideas are so flawed and I can't believe that your posting such rambling shit to try and convince yourself otherwise.
Perpetual_Hold_File is offline