Interesting distinction ebt. I can understand a journo regurgitating whatever is said to them under the "don't shoot me I'm only the messenger" rule, but a lawyer should be more aware of where the line between reporting the facts and obfuscation lies....shouldn't they?
I wonder how someone with such candid access to the very top echelons of an company would defend knowledge of smoke and mirrors used to disguise an organisations cultural issues while simultaneously receiving gifts from said company. I'm not saying that's the case here but one would want to tread carefully, as they say, if it walks like a duck
