Well, I would have thought that the existence of the thread I suggested could be made known to the meeting together with a clear statement that Ms Curtis-Taylor has been made aware of it and any answers or lack of them. I don’t see how doing that allows that meeting to “descend into total disruption”.
Surely it’s better for people to make their minds up based on some objective facts rather than the invective that has flowed in both directions over the last couple of years?