Sorry to comment again, but now, on top of suggestions that forced retirement on out of date science is good for the young, we have the suggestion that employers such as EZY, dont support it. Really gentlemen, what would have happened 100 years ago if employees had asked employers what they thought of mandatory holidays, sick pay, job security etc etc.
There is of course no mandatory insurance, so nothing to stop employees only paying for insurance that lasts until 65. In finance this is very common even though there is no mandatory retirement age in many cases.
Yet more counter arguments from those on the other side of the fence or those who are all right Jack....