For example in the NHS cases, we start with a background that during this same era there were around 100 very decent people who were meeting in hotels, to allege that staff at the same ABMU NHS falsified NHS records and that those in authority were even adversarial to decent people who complained. I think three or more ABMU NHS clinical staff have already been convicted in the same criminal courts as Maurice.
Where is the evidence for this - can you show us the source material?
Here's some evidence of MK's behaviour in court - you'll note his closing argument to the recorder is to throw his files at him upon which he is arrested for contempt. One of the premises of Kirk's case on this occasion was that his scans showed he had brain cancer and this was being hidden from the court. On the basis the hearing was eight years ago, it would seem that he was incorrect.
Apologies for the length:
IN THE CROWN COURT Indictment No T20107454
AT CARDIFF
The Law Courts
Cathays Park
Cardiff
CF10 3PG
24th June 2010
Before
THE RECORDER OF CARDIFF
HIS HONOUR JUDGE NICHOLAS COOKE QC
_____________________
REGINA
-vMAURICE
KIRK
_____________________
MR COBBE appeared on behalf of the Prosecution
THE DEFENDANT appeared in person
_____________________
APPLICATION
_____________________
24th June 2010
APPLICATION
(11.02 am)
THE RECORDER OF CARDIFF: I will start with Mr Cobbe, Mr Kirk, because I
may not have to trouble you very much, because I am going to order the disclosure of
documents, I believe. I have only asked for it to be listed because it did not seem I should
deal with it administratively and also so that I could explain what I do have on the court file. I
have been through it myself and the court staff have been through it.
I have received a letter – I am dealing with this in chambers because it involves Mr
Kirk’s mental and physical health and has nothing to do with the public, there is no
substantive criminal proceedings, there has been some contact with the office and I have been
shown a letter from a consultant anaesthetist in which he makes the reasonable point as
follows: “I am not able to undertake his anaesthetic care because of the conflicting medical
information that I have received. On the basis of imaging reports available to me, Mr Kirk
has bilateral multiple small cerebral ischemic foci. There was no evidence of any spaceoccupying
lesion. I believe the CT scan of the head was performed in December 2009.
However, I received conflicting information from Mr Kirk who has “heard” from the Crown
Prosecution Service. This information includes words such as tumour and cancer in the
brain.”
I interrupt my reading to indicate straightaway that there is absolutely nothing about
any cancer or tumour in the brain in any reports which the court holds. I have seen no such
material.
“As I have not had all the medical information available to me, I am unable to make a
judgment and take on Mr Kirk’s anaesthetic care. Leave this matter with Mr Kirk to either
pursue further investigations through his general practitioner or obtain written reports to
resolve this conflicting situation.”
Now all I can do, which I will do, is to order the disclosure of all the reports that the
court has and I have made a bundle up and I will order them to be photocopied, but that is all I
can do, there is no other proceedings before me, but they do not include any reference to such
things. There is a quotation from a report prepared by, I had better get the terminology right, a
neuropsychologist, which is included in one of Tegwyn Williams’ reports, but no copy of the
neuropsychologist’s report itself appears on the court file and there were clearly radiological
investigations undertaken, but those reports are not on the court file and I was not the trial
judge, I did not deal with the fitness to plead. Had I been dealing with the fitness to plead, I
might well have asked for such reports, but there is no evidence that anybody did and the
matter was resolved in Mr Kirk’s favour and therefore nothing arises, so any pursuit of those
reports would have to be through separate proceedings, but I do not think I have the power to
do anything else and Mr Kirk is clearly entitled to what I have got, and that is why, subject to
anything you say, Mr Cobbe, I order it.
MR COBBE: No, thank you, my Lord.
THE RECORDER OF CARDIFF: Well, I order the disclosure of everything I have got.
MR KIRK: That is the very (inaudible). I have the transcript here saying that I have
cancer.
THE RECORDER OF CARDIFF: I have not seen that, Mr Kirk.
MR KIRK: No, you have not seen the neuropsychologist’s report, who has rewritten the
document, trying to hide the information that Dr Tegwyn Williams told the judge on 2nd
December, his Honour Judge Bidder QC, for half an hour, saying that I was mad, bad and dangerous to know and that I was to be transferred to Ashworth Psychiatric Hospital. I served
on this court the transcript of the 2nd
...
THE RECORDER OF CARDIFF: Mr Kirk, this is ...
MR KIRK: You are trying to wash this under the carpet. We knew you would do this. I
have come with the documents ...
THE RECORDER OF CARDIFF: I am not, Mr Kirk, I have only been asked to disclose
documents to assist your anaesthetist and I have indicated everything we have got will be
disclosed and I have made the bundle up.
MR KIRK: I am giving you what he has not got.
THE RECORDER OF CARDIFF: Well, if you have got it, you do not need it from me.
MR KIRK: I want you to confirm, because the transcript has been doctored. The official
Cardiff transcript has been doctored. They waited until Tegwyn Williams stopped talking and
then they switched it on. But this Mr Tumbledown, CPS Tumbledown, he says that Mr
Tegwyn Williams believes I have cancer and then the judge says, “But we do not have two
relevant medical reports to ...”
THE RECORDER OF CARDIFF: I will gladly look at it, but I do not think I can make any
orders.
MR KIRK: I am serving it on this court.
THE RECORDER OF CARDIFF: Well, you are not, Mr Kirk. You do not serve things on
the court in that way ...
MR KIRK: Right, I throw it at you.
THE RECORDER OF CARDIFF: ... if you speak to me politely and you want me to look at
it, I will look at it.
MR KIRK: I have a file to lodge with this court.
THE RECORDER OF CARDIFF: You cannot lodge files, there are no proceedings in
being.
MR KIRK: I wish you to see the contents of this report and adjourn and come back after
you have studied this document.
THE RECORDER OF CARDIFF: These proceedings are concluded, thank you very much.
I have ordered the disclosure of the documents to assist the anaesthetist. The rest of this ...
MR KIRK: I have done it under Data Protection Act, I have done it under Freedom of
Information Act, I have done it three times now.
THE RECORDER OF CARDIFF: The rest of this is an abuse, Mr Kirk.
MR KIRK: It is an abuse application that I am making today.
THE RECORDER OF CARDIFF: Mr Kirk, there is no abuse application, there are no
proceedings against you.
MR KIRK: It is right here.
THE RECORDER OF CARDIFF: Arrest him. For the purpose of the record, Mr Kirk then
threw a file at me and he missed. Arrest him, put him in the cells please. Thank you very
much. I will put the matter before the High Court judge later today. Thank you. Take him
down please, clear the court. Take him straight down please.