Originally Posted by
megan
I've not made any conjectures from memory, and if I have it would have included a statement along the lines of "in my opinion".The 35° attitude at impact - it was at near vertical, but you can't accept it because you've so latched onto the CAB making errors. The CAB are correct, in fact, if I were one of the CAB staff involved in the report, and still alive, I'd be hauling your sorry carcass into court for your libellous allegations as to my abilities, integrity and professionalism.
I agree. IMO is the least one can say in critiquing another’s work product.
Have you any comment on the “AI at ninety to one hundred degrees”?
Specifically, what telltales, what chronology? Was it used to support the “vertical bank” theory at first impact? (Right wing at Railroad Tracks)? Was its inclusion to support the first impact, or the second?
With respect,
concours