PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 18th Jul 2012, 11:37   #21 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 8
Are any of you actually qualified to state whether an airline is stable or not?

Just looking at share prices is not going to give a picture of how stable the company is.

Do any of you have any business or investing experience.

I would say financially Jet2 is very stable.

It owns most of its aircraft, turns a profit every year, never made any flight crew redundant, is still expanding now when others are not and contrary to what allot of you are saying Investers Chronicle is recommending to buy Dart Group shares and has been for a long time.

I have to sit for many hours a day with people like you lot that think you know everything about how an airline is run!
eggc1vy3 is offline   Reply
Old 18th Jul 2012, 16:11   #22 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 4,706
I can't think that anyone who knows the history of Channel express air services or Jet 2 as it I'd known to the public would put them in the unsafe catorgry, the post by Stopstart on this subject being particularly accurate.

Also I dont think that anyone could call Norwegian Air Shuttle unsafe financially.

I can't help thinking that there is a lot of wishfull thinking from some posting above.

Last edited by A and C; 18th Jul 2012 at 16:12.
A and C is offline   Reply
Old 18th Jul 2012, 16:52   #23 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Upper Deck
Age: 49
Posts: 87
But look how confusing the picture is. Thomas Cook Belgium should be in the "Safe" department & JetAirFly (Belgium) could be printing money!!! but both are let down by the owning groups (TCX &TUI) which clearly need to be in the "un-safe" section.
jumbojet is offline   Reply
Old 18th Jul 2012, 17:55   #24 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 949
Jet2 never made flight crew redundant? Yeah good one....
no sponsor is offline   Reply
Old 18th Jul 2012, 18:15   #25 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,931
If you believe what Harry Dent says then probably hardly anything is safe:-


Last edited by fireflybob; 18th Jul 2012 at 18:16.
fireflybob is offline   Reply
Old 18th Jul 2012, 19:00   #26 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: I'm a nomad
Posts: 431
And what about Alitalia?
RedBullGaveMeWings is offline   Reply
Old 18th Jul 2012, 19:12   #27 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Polymer Records
Posts: 454
Quote:
Jet2 never made flight crew redundant? Yeah good one....
Go on then, do tell when (excluding pilots who refused to accept a transfer away from a based that was to close)
Artie Fufkin is offline   Reply
Old 19th Jul 2012, 08:33   #28 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 14 days away 14 at home
Posts: 650
I liked the question but seeing the answers I realise this thread is like asking my 2 year old to rate the flyability of all commercial aircraft available today. The answers really crack me up!

Next thing we know we will see on the PARUNE network (Professional Account Rumours Network) a discussion on who makes the safest derated take off's!
No RYR for me is offline   Reply
Old 19th Jul 2012, 11:11   #29 (permalink)

A Runyonesque Character
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Big E
Age: 63
Posts: 1,086
Quote:
AIMINGHIGH123: The big 3 Middle East carries the safest by a mile.
And how many of those three have ever made a profit?

Just asking.
The SSK is offline   Reply
Old 19th Jul 2012, 11:53   #30 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Scotland
Posts: 114
Loganair - fifty years in the game and in profit for the last decade. Lots of non-discretionary travellers and successfully operating in a niche.
Tubbs is offline   Reply
Old 19th Jul 2012, 11:58   #31 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 51'50' N
Posts: 41
All outbound Emirates flights are topping up with fuel bought in UAE, the stuff is probably cheaper than water. They've got a great route structure with a modern and efficient fleet. They wont be making a loss any time soon.
1000ft Cruiser is offline   Reply
Old 19th Jul 2012, 14:07   #32 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 212
Quote:
AIMINGHIGH123: The big 3 Middle East carries the safest by a mile.
And how many of those three have ever made a profit?

Just asking.


Well this lot for a start.............






Etihad records first ever full-year profit - FT.com
Dave Clarke Fife is offline   Reply
Old 19th Jul 2012, 16:29   #33 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London
Posts: 116
The SSK, I never said anything about profit just that they are very safe. Well Emitrates we all know about, they help bring a lot of revenue in for Dubai and Qatar is pretty similar, would people go there out of choice? As for Etihad well they had a lot of start up capital they might not like to admit it but come on like the other 2 they could get help a lot easier than our poor european carriers.

Last edited by AIMINGHIGH123; 19th Jul 2012 at 16:32.
AIMINGHIGH123 is offline   Reply
Old 19th Jul 2012, 17:15   #34 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 804
Quote:
All outbound Emirates flights are topping up with fuel bought in UAE, the stuff is probably cheaper than water.
Well, if fuel is cheap in UAE then for Emirates & Etihad only. For everybody else the fuel price there is quite up to the world market, with consideration for less costs on transport and volume.

If you look at Emirates annual accounts, they claim fuel is around 34% within the cost structure, which is about right percentage for any European or US airline. Now the question is whether you really believe Emirates reports?
CargoOne is offline   Reply
Old 20th Jul 2012, 10:49   #35 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Location, Location
Posts: 176
Quote:
All outbound Emirates flights are topping up with fuel bought in UAE, the stuff is probably cheaper than water. They've got a great route structure with a modern and efficient fleet. They wont be making a loss any time soon.
NOT TRUE about the fuel I'm afraid.

As a 777 skipper the only flights I can remember tankering on are Tehran and Cairo, which are usually tankering-limited anyway on the old 777-200 non-ER due to residual centre tank fuel with max ZFWs.

Not sure where you got that info from.

Last edited by Mr Good Cat; 20th Jul 2012 at 10:49.
Mr Good Cat is offline   Reply
Old 20th Jul 2012, 11:35   #36 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Number 10 Samsonite Street
Posts: 59
Pan American Airlines....definitely safe!

The truth is is any one safe? Just because an airline is the biggest, has been around the longest, makes the most money etc. doesn't make it bullet proof. Maybe on paper, but it only takes a major incident or world event to turn the tide.
Aviation history is littered with names of airlines who in their heyday where probably thought to survive the toughest of climates.

Food for thought, an interesting discussion though!

Last edited by VeroFlyer; 20th Jul 2012 at 11:35.
VeroFlyer is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 23:15.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".