PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Terms and Endearment The forum the beancounters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work. Let others in the industry make educated choices on where the grass is less brown! Scheduled, charter or contract -


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20th August 2009, 22:28   #701 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: right behind you
Posts: 539
Empty vessels really do make the most noise!!!
the grim repa is offline   Reply
Old 20th August 2009, 22:33   #702 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: (no longer in )france
Posts: 1,117
Wingco,
Long time no hear, and I thought we parted friends on a dull grey BVA apron ?
Well, I tried to help the "good guys", but all said & done there weren't enough of them among us & too many self interests involved with the majority.
So, dear Wingco, as discussed, I "retired" from that effort somewhat demoralised by the desire (or rather lack of ) of my fellow cohorts to change their future for the better.
It seems in my absence it has gone even more to a crock of sh1t.
Well, at least now it doesn't really affect me, still find it sad when I reflect on how good, with so little change /expenditure from the other side, it could be.
Anyway, glad to hear you still have an opinion, it's been a while. . . . .
captplaystation is offline   Reply
Old 20th August 2009, 23:38   #703 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Earth (just)
Posts: 688
Hehe! Friends indeed! I'm not one to harbour a grudge after having the opportunity to "deal" with issues head on. Nevertheless if you read through my eyes, some of the things you have written, then you must understand my amusement. I wish you well Gaystation and do appreciate that you mean well regarding our plight......

Fly safe!
Wing Commander Fowler is offline   Reply
Old 22nd August 2009, 01:35   #704 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 17
Captplay



I have to say I am not to impressed by captplay's thoughts. I would believe he is a "below 30 never ever worked anywhere else pilot"
I cannot understand why he picks on RYR at this moment. For God's sake look around you. 737 pilots where do you rather be? Korea, Nigeria or India. Belive me it s much better to be inside RYR looking out than the other way around.

At the moment if you have a job, fly enjoy your job and plan for the future.
If you have no job I wish you all the best in getting one.

Good luck to you all./Teddy
teddyman is offline   Reply
Old 22nd August 2009, 10:30   #705 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: (no longer in )france
Posts: 1,117
"Below 30 " ! ! ? I wish

9 other companies to be taken into consideration too.

I never ever say that taken in the context of being stuck in India /China /Korea / God forbid Lagos that Ryanair is a bad place to be.
No night flights, home every night if you have achieved your desired base, shiny new aircraft.
All I say, if you read carefully, is that it is just a damn shame that the confrontational style adopted by management, coupled with a desire to rob their employees every time something is "renegotiated" take the edge off it a little.
With very little extra expenditure, and merely a change in attitude, it could & should be so much better (easily the best job around if that were the case ). Even the most rabid supporters will normally agree with that.
captplaystation is offline   Reply
Old 22nd August 2009, 11:19   #706 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: varies..a lot
Posts: 341
Have to say after reading ALL these threads along with my own personal experience ( albeit a short one so far ) there is little wrong with both sides of the present arguement, what is screwing up the industry is the middle/upper management of all these companies who really are shafting staff and seem in MANY cases ( not all ) to be unable to deliver a GOOD product to the public, pay the staff appropriately and return an acceptable profit!!!! Surely a bit of moderation on all sides and some recognition of the hard work supplied by all involved in the industry would see a better/safer environment for all. My thoughts on FR? I used to believe they were sensational, MOL is now pushing the model beyond what is necessary and turning it into a farce. No respect from the public and obviously from a large internal %.
I agree that those who currently have an income and are getting hours should be thankful and I also agree that they should not lose sight of the fact that the job profile is rapidly becoming fairly cr@p! YES some of you have this amazing 5/4 roster ( the BEST in aviation history YAWN!!!) and SOME of you are getting great pay but lets face it, MANY are not and looking at the trends is is certainly not improving. I respect all who work in the airlines, I have worked on the ramp, check-in, boarding and the flight deck and so far all these positions have been poorly paid considering the hard work/hours that are required. A bit more respect and recognition from management in their ivory towers would see an increase in pay and an increase in loyalty which in turn will give more experienced staff and a better product to the public.
In short, quit screwing the staff, deliver a good product, INCREASE air fares to what is a NORMAL price ( not a return to the good old days ) so that the airlines can function and pay staff and lets all get on with it! There MUST be a middle ground out there somewhere which can be aimed for surely????
powdermonkey is offline   Reply
Old 22nd August 2009, 11:46   #707 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Dre's mum's house
Posts: 1,295
Quote:
In short, quit screwing the staff, deliver a good product, INCREASE air fares to what is a NORMAL price ( not a return to the good old days ) so that the airlines can function and pay staff and lets all get on with it!
Good plan powdermonkey: this is what IATA has to say about LFs and revenues:

Quote:
The International Air Transport Association (IATA) announced international scheduled traffic results for June showing passenger demand declining 7.2% compared to the same month in the previous year while freight demand was down 16.5%. International passenger load factors stood at 75.3%, down from 77.6% recorded in June 2008.

The 7.2% drop in international passenger demand was a slight improvement on the 9.3% fall in May. The capacity adjustment of -4.3% did not keep pace with the fall in demand leaving average fares and yields under significant pressure. As a result, June revenue on international markets fell by a shocking 25-30%.
Taking capacity out of the market is not leading to an increase in revenues: it is reducing DOCs but little else as the Indirects still have to be covered.

A better solution is to collectively look at ways of reducing costs, increasing productivity and minimising waste, be that waste lost bags, discarded meals, excess fuel carriage, hammering the brakes etc.

The issue at the moment is not "making a profit" it is "not making a loss": we have seen several names disappear in the last 18 months and there will be more to come. The once great BA is in dire straits and has no legacy right to survival and BALPA will not and cannot provide a barrier or protection against market forces.
The Real Slim Shady is offline   Reply
Old 22nd August 2009, 12:28   #708 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: varies..a lot
Posts: 341
Slim,
Mine was not a thought for the immediate, I have seen my previous employer fill ac all summer yet make all profit! Right now its a fight to keep trading I understand that, BUT...I still maintain that the trend ( PRE - Recession) of charging all and as a result HAVING to reduce T&C's, pax service etc etc etc is cr@p for both sides of the industry. It is RIDICULOUS to pay so little to travel to another country as it was RIDICULOUS to pay on average £350 to fly to Paris in the late 70's early 80's.....hence my comment on middle ground as something to be aimed for in the future. Unfortunately, the public EXPECTS to fly for nothing these days, how does that help anyone?? And I AM also the public and have found myself complaining because my return fare to Paris was OMG €50 odd!!!1Risiculous expectations. See my point?

PS and yes all waste savings is ALSO something to aim for in all cases as long as it simply doesnt make the board and shareholders richer whilst further operational costs ( ie salaries ) are further reduced. I am not disagreeing with you, this is not a pro/con BALPA observation just a general view on the industry as a whole, your job, my next job etc etc
powdermonkey is offline   Reply
Old 22nd August 2009, 12:55   #709 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Dre's mum's house
Posts: 1,295
I do see your point but the business is segmenting: segmentation by brand has been take to a new level by the locos and their revenue streams have moved from the traditional one ticket buys everything to pay as you go.

Conversely, while the airlines have been adopting, more and more, the pay as you go method, hotels /resorts have been turning more and more to the all inclusive concept.

Perhaps it is because a flight is becoming less of a discretionary purchase than a 2 week holiday and the consumer sees it as a necessary evil to get from A to B rather than as an integral part of their holiday.

Competition also lowers prices: if you compare like for like stage lengths where there is / are multiple carriers with monopolies you will find the a vast variation in pricing.

In due course Ryanair will evolve, as will BA, Virgin and every other carrier: the process is dynamic, driven by incremental small changes introduced somewhere and adopted by many.

Whether we are still working, or long retired by the time the change takes effect is a moot point.
The Real Slim Shady is offline   Reply
Old 22nd August 2009, 13:22   #710 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: varies..a lot
Posts: 341
Mmmm well I hope by the time if find re-employment I'll be getting more than min wage!!!!!!!
I guess you are right,eventually a level playing field will have to be reached but neither extremes are sustainable long term......once the industry starts to climb out of this recession, am still pro-union, NOT to argue every pithy little point but in order for some balance to be restored across the board! If not BALPA why not another?
powdermonkey is offline   Reply
Old 22nd August 2009, 13:24   #711 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,221
Whether it is ridiculous to pay £350 to travel to Paris or not, it is probably a truer reflection of the costs involved of running a long term regular and profitable service. It isn't that people expect to be able to do this for nothing, indeed they realize that being shuttled about in £50 million capital assets isn't likely to be cheap. They really want to be able to travel in sumptuous comfort, being plied with grapes and champagne, and be whisked through to their destination with speed and good grace. The problem is most of them can't afford the true cost of that. The compromise means that the various levels of discomfort and hassle they face, generally justifies the search for a bargain price.

The advent of the pile em high sell em cheap airlines (or supermarkets, car warehouses, etc.) requires that in order to suceed both of the conditions have to be satisfied. That requires very high yield to even hope to achieve any sort of acceptable margin or indeed any profit. The £350 fares probably satisfied the cost base at 50% load factors or less. The bargain basement fares most certainly won't. When that yield starts to fall away, because the novelty wears off, spending priorities change, or more competition comes to town, you are faced with 3 choices: 1) Raise the fares and hope the fickle customers dont run across the street to the competition; 2) cut the operating costs to the bone; 3) Slash your own fares to increase yield even though that yield will still lose you money, and hope that the competition bleeds to death before you do.

As long as there is competition, these will always be the cyclical realities of this market segment. If you want comfort and champagne, take the train from London to Paris, it is quicker, nicer, more convenient, and for all the best advantages will still cost you £350!
Bealzebub is offline   Reply
Old 22nd August 2009, 13:37   #712 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: varies..a lot
Posts: 341
Indeed Bealzebub
Code:
The advent of the pile em high sell em cheap airlines (or supermarkets, car warehouses, etc.)
is what I have alway called "the race to the bottom". Unfortunatley is its a reality, and as you say I am sure if pax could afford it, they would prefer to travel under slightly better conditions, but I expect long term the CORRECT ratio of fares to running cost will come about, without excluding too large a % of the public and at the same time redeeming the industry a little for the better.
powdermonkey is offline   Reply
Old 23rd August 2009, 10:56   #713 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 3433N 06912E
Posts: 201
Now all the back biting and bickering is out of the way, it's good to see some constructive discussion concerning the industry.

Bruce Wayne is offline   Reply
Old 24th August 2009, 00:23   #714 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 17
Sorry

Captplay!
I should have read your posts better before responding. I bow for thee...
I am one of the lucky ones in RYR who you do not find so often on PPRuNe. Base I want, My family every night, my own bed and so on. My life is great
I hope that all you pilots who are not so lucky will try to do something about it in a positive way. Change base, try living outside the UK (believe me, food is better). Look for oportunities instead of problems. Porto, Trapani, Bologna, Alghero and so on.
Tomorrow I will fly one of these new shiny birds again and come home to my family in the evening. Life is great.
/Teddy
teddyman is offline   Reply
Old 24th August 2009, 01:08   #715 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: monaco
Posts: 51
teddyman,

maybe tomorrow I will fly from a base which is not really what I call home, I will fly with someone who is on a different contract and will be discussing why he or I do the same job in the same base for less money,maybe I will be flying my 5th day and looking forward to the next 3 dats off 'cause I'm in a 5/3 base,maybe I will be on annual leave that I haven't chosen (impossible from next year in july/august when I will be working while the kids & wife are on holiday) or on my unpaid month off,maybe I will be sick at home without pay nor medical care (unless I have arranged my own), maybe I will be travelling to EMT or STN for my sim paying for transport&hotel, maybe I will be signing a cheque for my own loss of licence or pension scheme, maybe I will be working on a day off without any extra money, maybe I will paying for my wife's ticket so she can come visit me because we have no discounted tickets for family (brk),maybe I will be calling OPS or maintenance at my own expense from abroad to discuss operational issues, maybe I will be reporting 20/30 minutes before the official reporting time just to be sure I can get a printer that works and be ready on time, maybe I will be paying for my airport carpark and ID, maybe I will be on my 7th or 8th STBY day of the month, maybe I will have been waiting for my base of choice for a couple of years with no luck, maybe I will have to live in one of those beautiful new bases alone because there is no international school for the kids in a radius of 500nm, maybe I will get sent out of base and will have to travel on my days off at my own expense.....and so on teddyman.

Don't want to sound pessimistic but just want you to realize that just because you are one of the few "happy at home" ones it doesn't mean that the other 2999 are smiling like you are (there are around 3000 of us right?).
There are surely good things about this company but there also are bad ones, and making it a better place to work should be an aim for all of us.

P.S.: I will also fly one of those shiny jets tomorrow and will be thinking how to make a good life even better because the one we have is far from great....at least for most of us.
dannyalliga is offline   Reply
Old 24th August 2009, 08:00   #716 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 70
WOW!
Powerful stuff.
Danny, I`d say that came straight from the heart!

These last two posts seem to go right to the crux of the matter.
Flyingstig is offline   Reply
Old 24th August 2009, 09:36   #717 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: hertfordshire
Posts: 92
Brakes are cheaper than fuel (So I was told) - hammer the brakes.

Teddyman - I am one of the lucky ones too, however I feel compelled to try and help my less fortunate colleagues. I will remove you from the list seeing as you are ok.

Danny - A terrible truth that affects so many chaps here.
eagerbeaver1 is offline   Reply
Old 24th August 2009, 15:49   #718 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: (no longer in )france
Posts: 1,117
teddyman & danny,

As has been said, you are both completely correct, which is the problem we face.
How to make someone anti-Ryanair when he feels well with his lot ? well, we can't & indeed shouldn't.
What we should do as a group is try to understand why the other guys feels so hard done by , & ,AS A GROUP, try to have the imagination to see that one day, our happy little base/ situation may well end (as it has for many ) & that WE TOO are about to (involuntarily ) find ourselves in the discontented camp instead.
Everyone should have the imagination to see this, or they could one day find themselves in for a very big shock
captplaystation is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:38.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".