ILS 4 KLGA
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ILS 4 KLGA
In the notes for this approach on the Jepp chart, it states that you can't fly this approach with the autopilot coupled. Can anyone explain where this came from?
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ah the ILS 4 at LGA! As an American pilot said many years ago--"the mist cheated on approach in the US. I can't speak to that but when the mins were 400-1 (IIRC), it was common to have the ATIS report Ceiling 200, Visibility 1 mile and every body getting in. Once I was there, the tower was challenged on the weather and the reason for using 4, tower just said "everybody's is landing OK". I was there the night the FAA DC-3 doing flight check crashed on the ILS 4.
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: At home
Age: 64
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will venture a guess and it's only a guess. I was in LGA last week and there is a lot of construction going on. The NOTAM talks about a crane a 406ft. crane to be exact, if I am reading that correctly and the Lat/ Long puts it at the center of the terminal.
I do know that the MD-80 gets freaky on approach if there are obstacles not in the certification plane of that LOC or G.S. The airplane will porpoise on short final if the ground plane for the G.S. is uneven or if an auto-land is attempted on a runway not normally approved for that type of landing. The MD-80 autopilot is first generation and uses radio altitude rate information in the fare mode which starts just after passing 200'agl. Runway centerline tracking via the localizer and wind correction is also applied when flare mode is annunciated, it is a very flaky process on a CAT 1 runway, and even kind of weird on a fully Cat III runway.
This tower is 406 ft, and MDA for all Categories are 305 and 5000RVR. That puts the tower above published minimums.
As I said at the start, and it's just a guess, this NOTAM may be to protect the Localizer and Glideslope reception field which might be very disruptive to an autopilot, due to a large crane / tower.
I do know that the MD-80 gets freaky on approach if there are obstacles not in the certification plane of that LOC or G.S. The airplane will porpoise on short final if the ground plane for the G.S. is uneven or if an auto-land is attempted on a runway not normally approved for that type of landing. The MD-80 autopilot is first generation and uses radio altitude rate information in the fare mode which starts just after passing 200'agl. Runway centerline tracking via the localizer and wind correction is also applied when flare mode is annunciated, it is a very flaky process on a CAT 1 runway, and even kind of weird on a fully Cat III runway.
This tower is 406 ft, and MDA for all Categories are 305 and 5000RVR. That puts the tower above published minimums.
As I said at the start, and it's just a guess, this NOTAM may be to protect the Localizer and Glideslope reception field which might be very disruptive to an autopilot, due to a large crane / tower.
