Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Landing gear tilt angle difference between a B777 200LR & 300ER

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Landing gear tilt angle difference between a B777 200LR & 300ER

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jun 2017, 18:57
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: india
Age: 39
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JetII - the stow angle is 5 nose down (200LR) however the capability is -19 down. Question was which phase of flight it goes to -19?

What's more surprising is that in both pictures posted by me the only time 'ground' or 'touchdown surface' is shown is when the angle is -19. Rest images only a horizontal line is shown (to exaggerate a medium to differentiate the angle wrt zero datum)

Hence my doubt
agg_karan is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2017, 00:19
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OT: I see that Boeing is looking to use the semi-lever design for the Max 10 to prevent tailstrike.
underfire is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2017, 06:03
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
How does that work on a single axle bogie ?
stilton is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2017, 07:52
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Before,they were calling it telescoping, but at Paris, they are calling it a semi-lever or trailing link. Was thinking along the lines of the Embraer E2 landing gear, but not sure with this from Boeing.

737 MAX vice-president and general manager Keith Leverkuhn said in Feb 2017 ."Boeing has been evaluating multiple “good ideas”, including a shift from the 737’s traditional oleo strut to a trailing link landing gear design, A key criteria in the final decision (of the MAX-10) later this year will be the inherent reliability of the landing gear design,"

Keith Leverkuhn said on 2nd May about the -10 MLG: “The design focus is on the upper portion of the gear as it integrates with the actuator. In this area, within the tight confines of the existing wheel well, Boeing’s new design will do some “clever folding using a link mechanism at the top,”

"The lower section of the leg is also modified with an additional shock strut that fits inside the same forging. This moves the contact point aft a little bit. That’s fundamentally what we are doing and yes, it will look like a trailing link gear. We want to make it maintainable, reliable, and we are going to need that gear to get the performance we want out of the -10 but I’m confident in the solution set,”

Last edited by underfire; 1st Jul 2017 at 08:04.
underfire is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2017, 14:03
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Country
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by agg_karan
JetII - the stow angle is 5 nose down (200LR) however the capability is -19 down. Question was which phase of flight it goes to -19?
Rotation.

On rotation the aircraft rotates around the centre axle which then gives you the 'nose down' scenario - although you will never get to -19 in real life.
Jet II is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2017, 14:07
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Country
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sounds more like an A330 style gear strut mechanism than a 777 SLG.
Jet II is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.