EFATO Airbus FCTM
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EFATO Airbus FCTM
"The combination of high FLEX temperature and low V speeds requires precise handing during the rotation and lift off."
Low speeds makes sense as the controls are less effective.
Surely it would be a lower FLEX temp (higher thrust) that requires more precise handling. In this scenario more rudder will be required especially in combination with the low speeds than with higher FLEX temp.
Have I missed something?
Low speeds makes sense as the controls are less effective.
Surely it would be a lower FLEX temp (higher thrust) that requires more precise handling. In this scenario more rudder will be required especially in combination with the low speeds than with higher FLEX temp.
Have I missed something?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes,the high flex reduces thrust and with loss of 50℅ thrust it requires gentle rotation to prevent loss speed. Since speed is also low the rudders requires more deflection to generate the effect as compared to high speed. Lower flex cause more yaw but higher speed compensates for it.
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: big green wheely bin
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What you have missed is that it's not about yaw control. It's about rotation rate, speed control, and V2.
Try an A321 at 93.5T with a relatively high flex temp, and you will see what it's talking about.
Try an A321 at 93.5T with a relatively high flex temp, and you will see what it's talking about.
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Middle England
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Has anyone got an A321 sim though? We only fly the 321 but have to do our check on a 320 sim.
There are too many variables in the EFATO scenario for a "one size fits all" answer. Most of our performance generates 1+F figures that are improved climb. Some runways have much lower speeds but with flap 3 and TOGA. They are dynamic events that need careful handling to achieve a successful outcome.
There are too many variables in the EFATO scenario for a "one size fits all" answer. Most of our performance generates 1+F figures that are improved climb. Some runways have much lower speeds but with flap 3 and TOGA. They are dynamic events that need careful handling to achieve a successful outcome.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 5° above the Equator, 75° left of Greenwich
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was reading for a sim session I have in some days and I read this just today. It made me wonder this very same question. I was thinking somewhere along the lines of what vilas said, a matter of low energy + low control surfaces authority
N4790P
Today, GO5 will only provide an A320 datapack. Many, many years ago they would supply tail number datapacks and DLH, Swissair (as it was then) and maybe TAP received A321 FFSs. Now these sims are quite old standards and probably not possible to update.