A320 EXP DES - V/S 0 - PFD Speed Trend Vector Peculairity
Thread Starter
A320 EXP DES - V/S 0 - PFD Speed Trend Vector Peculairity
An unusual behaviour which I have never been able to put my finger on.
If one is in EXP DES and pushes V/S 0, even with a decelerating airspeed, the trend vector heads north until its off the airspeed scale.
Does anybody know why?
If one is in EXP DES and pushes V/S 0, even with a decelerating airspeed, the trend vector heads north until its off the airspeed scale.
Does anybody know why?
Bula,
You've probably give the computer a Vestibular or somatogravic illusion while trying to do a 1.2 or is that a 1.3g level off.
Another fun one I've noticed (Airbus) is how the wind vector changes when taking off or turning in the circuit areas. I've always put it down to the relatively high rates of change whether it be acceleration, angle etc.
You've probably give the computer a Vestibular or somatogravic illusion while trying to do a 1.2 or is that a 1.3g level off.
Another fun one I've noticed (Airbus) is how the wind vector changes when taking off or turning in the circuit areas. I've always put it down to the relatively high rates of change whether it be acceleration, angle etc.
Only half a speed-brake
Not in EXP DES. I read it he'd use the EXP DES to send the A/C in a dive, then push V/S=0 and as the pitch comes up the speed starts to drop...
Join Date: May 2007
Location: FL390
Age: 38
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If one is in EXP DES and pushes V/S 0, even with a decelerating airspeed, the trend vector heads north until its off the airspeed scale.
I have no idea but it should be due to the longitudinal acceleration component during ALT*
Thread Starter
You are correct. EXP DES then VS 0. Pitch up, aircraft pitches, aircraft decelerates.
Thanks for the answers people.
My thinking is given the trend vector is IRS based, I'm guessing the constant Pitch G is being mistaken for a constant acceleration G. Though this is assumption, it seems we are on the same page.
It always amuses the person next to me.
Thanks for the answers people.
My thinking is given the trend vector is IRS based, I'm guessing the constant Pitch G is being mistaken for a constant acceleration G. Though this is assumption, it seems we are on the same page.
It always amuses the person next to me.