B737-300 autoland on one autopilot
Thread Starter
B737-300 autoland on one autopilot
Some years ago, a Boeing instructor pilot told me the 737-300 does a perfectly satisfactory autoland on one autopilot except there is no stabiliser back trimming at 400 ft. Have since seen this demonstrated many times in the 737-300 simulator and it works nicely even though no stab trim operation at 400 ft. The flare is perfect.
What is the purpose therefore of the stab trim winding back at 400 ft RA on a two autopilot autoland when it doesn't happen on a single pilot autoland?
What is the purpose therefore of the stab trim winding back at 400 ft RA on a two autopilot autoland when it doesn't happen on a single pilot autoland?
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think it's about the go around. I believe it is a fail safe so that in the unlikely event of an uncommanded disconnect the aircraft won't fly straight into the ground but level off slightly giving you enough time to take manual control. It doesn't happen with a single channel approach because the assumption is you will be landing manually.
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But why would you? If it's not authorised, legally, and you can do 1 CH down to 200' then manual land, is that not enough if the RVR is OK. I suspect most of us might pause a little at disconnect time. The a/c will be in trim and a gentle breath on the elevator is all that is required. With the approach ban criteria is anyone suggesting they would commence an approach to autoland outside specified criteria; both RVR and suitable ground aids? Is this discussion not just a academic? Perhaps it can, but can it be used? Rules would have to change. Until then, except in a dire emergency, who s going to try and risk it?
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: England
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not my area of expertise, but perhaps it is worth bearing in mind that just because the sim will do something doesn't mean the aircraft will do it. Bear in mind that if the aircraft isn't certified to do it there is no virtue in spending money simulating it realistically. We aren't talking real aircraft hardware in most cases.
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kopavogur
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In reality, the aircraft will NOT flare, no matter what you see in the simulator.
Sim is NOT the real aircraft. No back-trim at 370' is no flare in real life, and both will not occur with single autopilot approaches.
So do not try it, not only is it not approved, there is also a reason for it not being approved😏
I am now on B744 and that is a completely different story 😀
Sim is NOT the real aircraft. No back-trim at 370' is no flare in real life, and both will not occur with single autopilot approaches.
So do not try it, not only is it not approved, there is also a reason for it not being approved😏
I am now on B744 and that is a completely different story 😀
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: In Space
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A friend at FR done it on the line and asked did I know the aircraft could do it? My reply was yes it can do it but why the hell do it and put yourself in a vulnerable position?!!