Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A319-A320 Take Off Distances Wet Weather ?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A319-A320 Take Off Distances Wet Weather ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Jun 2016, 07:31
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Nuweiba
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A319-A320 Take Off Distances Wet Weather ?

Would appreciate very much following help with these two questions :

What would be the expected take-off distance of an A319 with 150 pax in wet weather ( 10 Degrees Celsius ) for a flight of two hours duration ?

Same question but for an A320 with 180 pax.

Can't find take-off charts anywhere as I can for Boeing models.

Thanks !
Nuweiba is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2016, 12:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It Depends on runway conditions, winds, weight and balance, temperature (As you said) and other factors.
BEL1000 is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2016, 13:50
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Luton is 7000feet long and you can easily fly for four hours from there off a wet runway in an A320
tubby linton is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2016, 19:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sweet Kamalani! Somebody puts even more people in their 319/320 than we do. Ours hold 145 and 178 respectively.
Amadis of Gaul is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2016, 06:17
  #5 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,321
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Shortest: 1197 m.
Longest: 2281 m. -> accelerate stop-distance 3015!

Last edited by FlightDetent; 29th Jun 2016 at 06:44.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2016, 06:35
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps provide the foundation for this? Is this a sim question?

The takeoff is well defined in the AB procedures. It is not just about # of pax.
underfire is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2016, 06:43
  #7 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,321
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
20160629_062205000_iOS.jpg

20160629_063906000_iOS.jpg
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2016, 19:57
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FD...yes, the AB app!

https://itunes.apple.com/au/app/flys...610875322?mt=8

https://itunes.apple.com/au/app/flys...610882356?mt=8
underfire is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2016, 05:24
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Nuweiba
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many thanks - very informative and helpful !

And yes.... Amadis... they do ! Easyjet for starters ! :-)

I have been trying to calculate if an A320 could operate from Guernsey ( GCI ). I know they have had Titan A320 flights but with 110 - 120 pax.

Once again many thanks !
Nuweiba is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2016, 18:23
  #10 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,321
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Now you're providing information and making this interesting

I ran a calculation for a sea level runway identical to the shorter GCI 09. No obstacles, though. With wet runway max perf TOW comes out at 65 tonnes. That's actually quite a lot!

For your use it is safe to assume 44 t empty aircraft weight, 2,5 t fuel at landing and there are your 18.500 kilograms to play with.

Passangers or fuel, it's up to you. Deduct 1 t for take-off and initial climb, then 2,8 per hour of flight at 400 kts groundspeed. Average customer at 95 kgs.

FlightDetent is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2016, 18:58
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Coventry
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nuweiba, I see there's a campaign to extend Guernsey's runway from 1463m to 1700m so A320 and 737 can use it. Can anyone tell me if 1700m would accommodate 319/320/737 fully loaded in all weather conditions? If not, what runway length is needed?
LesF is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2016, 11:25
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
You certainly wouldn't get a fully loaded A320 off the ground in guernsey with anything worse than 0 head wind (eg a tail wind) but i'm sure you'd not even manage that. I'll try to remember to work it out for you but you are never going to get 77 tonnes airborne on that runway with a tailwind.
giggitygiggity is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2016, 12:05
  #13 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,321
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
With 1700 m and some adverse conditions it is full house and 9 tonnes of fuel. Thus approximately 1200 NM range.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2016, 18:23
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: England
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe if Guernsey are looking at increasing the runway length to 1700m or so it's to attract short haul UK A319/320 traffic as Jersey does. May make sense if the business case
adds up and airlines like Easy and BA were very interested. Also Aurigny could consider upgrading aircraft type giving more flexibility.
Musket90 is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2017, 23:17
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Nuweiba
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very interesting replies. Yes the runway extension question for Guernsey has arisen once again.

Titan have operated their A320 in Guernsey on behalf of Aurigny though clearly not fully loaded. Maybe 120 - 130 passengers and on the Gatwick or Stansted routes.

Proponents of the longer runway base their arguments on the need to match Jersey, ( with 1706 metres ) and, believe it or not, on the need to show that Guernsey is open for business. No new airlines, routes or increases of passenger numbers can be proven if the runway is extended - but there is simply a belief among some politicians and business leaders that "if one builds it, they will come".

Funny enough, Easyjet showed interest in operating on the Gatwick - Guernsey route, with the current runway, and only withdrew that interest due, according to the Strategic Air Links Review of 2015, to the local government issuing a statement declaring the need to protect local carrier Aurigny on that route.

Furthermore, whilst extending the runway to the length of Jersey will allow A320s and A319s to operate in to Guernsey from further afield, assuming the demand for larger aircraft exists on those routes, it still will not allow the likes of Ryanair, Norwegian and Thomson to operate into the island as the B737-800 and larger aircraft can not even operate into Jersey.
Nuweiba is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2017, 10:25
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Ireland/UK
Age: 38
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As of the end of May all new 737-800 deliveries to FR are fitted with the Short Filed Performance (SFP) package. No idea if there is any interest in Jersey or Guernsey however.

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...orders-205862/
https://flyinginireland.com/2017/06/...date-may-2017/
FerrisBueller is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.