Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

TAS Reduction above crossover altitude

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

TAS Reduction above crossover altitude

Old 9th Apr 2016, 18:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Bournemouth, occasionally in the air
Age: 28
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TAS Reduction above crossover altitude

Hi all,

Just been doing some research for an ATPL uni assignment and trying to get my head around the rate of TAS reduction once the crossover altitude has been reached/exceeded.

I understand that climbing up to the crossover altitude is conducted with a constant CAS (and increasing TAS) until reaching the crossover altitude, whereby constant Mach is used (therefore decreasing TAS).

However, above this crossover altitude does TAS reduce at the same rate as below the crossover altitude (if that made any sense). Also, if an aircraft reaches its cruise flight level where the TAS is lower, could the operator simply not cruise at the crossover altitude. The only issue I could think for doing this however is the proximity of other aircraft also cruising at the crossover altitude to achieve the highest TAS.

Any help would be most appreciated!
Ledhead27 is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2016, 19:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: overthere
Posts: 3,037
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts
It all depends on what happens with the temperature. For example, on an ISA day the machine I fly will TAS at 513kts at M0.85 at FL300 (crossover ALT). Keeping ISA we get we get 490ish at FL400 at same Mach speed, or 500ks at ISA plus 10.

Cost index is used to optimise cruise ALT. Disregarding winds aloft, A higher cost index will result in a lower cruise ALT, with faster TAS and higher fuel flow. A lower Cost index will increase the ALT to minimise fuel flow and result in a slower TAS.
donpizmeov is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2016, 21:46
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Sunrise Senior Living
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So if you're in a hurry, go at FL290!
mcdhu
mcdhu is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2016, 22:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: SPAIN
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi, as far as i am concerned, the climb is at constant IAS and then, you will change to constant MACH, climbing at a constant IAS will result in a MACH increase upon reaching a level in which you will change to constant MACH, as you may know from instrumentation a climb with constant mach will result in a reduction of IAS/TAS/EAS/CAS...

Some reasons not to fly at the optimum altitude may be more headwind or more tailwind at other altitude. Ant the reason of being above, below or at the optimum altitude is just fuel saving. I dont know if that makes sense for you or answer anything you were asking/wondering.
ROKVIATOR is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2016, 22:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 56
Posts: 3,079
Received 441 Likes on 121 Posts
The answer is money. It costs too much to cruise at the crossover level.
framer is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2016, 17:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
NB that for a standard atmosphere, when climbing above the tropopause at constant Mach then TAS will be constant. The issue with cruising at the crossover altitude is that you need to consider the required RPM for range speed or LRC and that it may well be below the optimum for engine efficiency and so specific air range will be less than flying higher at the optimum altitude.
LOMCEVAK is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.