Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A 320 select speed in abnormal procedures

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A 320 select speed in abnormal procedures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Mar 2015, 13:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Wrong side
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A 320 select speed in abnormal procedures

Hello everybody,
During my A320 type rating course, my instructor has told me that everytime I have to increase the Vapp with speed additives due to abnormal or emergency procedures, I have to perform approach no in Speed Managed but in Speed Select.
I have tried to find something in the FCOM or FTCM but with no result.
Has someone a reference to give me?
Thank you guys.
Espero is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2015, 16:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What kind of emergency? Maybe its related to slats or flaps jam.
Freelander is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2015, 21:22
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Wrong side
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Freelander, not only flaps/slats jammed, but all the abnormal/emergency procedures that require speed additives.
Espero is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2015, 13:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Espero
You can't find any reference because there is none. It is not because of speed additives but because the slat/flap jam requires a different way of configuring the aircraft, abnormality that has slat/flap problem select speed is recommended. That is also not necessary after you select final landing configuration( flap3) since you have amended your Vapp in PERF page. You can go managed if you wish.
vilas is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2015, 16:16
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Wrong side
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Vilas, thank you for your answer. I have had some doubts because the instructor showed me a Conversion Course Manual of an European Flag Carrier where they say that.
But, as you mention, no references on FCOM or FCTM.
Espero is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 09:54
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Uh... Where was I?
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any particular case where you have to execute the approach with selected speed will be specified.

Elsewise, managed speed is recommended.
Microburst2002 is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 23:56
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Buenos Aires
Age: 47
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For example , check in the G+B HYD summary in the QRH :

FOR FLAPS EXTENSION

SPD SEL ..........VFE NEXT-5 KT
Groove330 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2015, 14:37
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I want to be
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vilas,

Despite the statement in the QRH Landing with Slats or Flaps Jammed "Approach with selected speed is recommended" it is mandatory in my airline to use selected.

I assume this requirement is to arrest the groundspeed mini function from becoming problematic especially when field length limited. And for a Flap 0 landing for the 10kt Vref decrease when nearing the fence.
G.Green is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2015, 14:55
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Having a margarita on the beach
Posts: 2,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Same here.
sonicbum is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2015, 01:44
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you have a company procedure you have no option but to follow it. Some people are not comfortable with GS mini concept. Flaps 0 case you have to reduce speed later so it can only be done in select speed.
vilas is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2015, 10:56
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I want to be
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some people are not comfortable with GS mini concept.
Its not so much that but of the possibility of inaccurate tower wind reporting (especially if you have a limiting runway with abnormal flap configuration) which this writer has encountered quite a few times.
G.Green is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2015, 00:24
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GG
That seems to be a fair assumption.
vilas is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2015, 06:29
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually, I think what your instructor is covering is that following certain failures, the FM doesn't always know the landing config and if managed speed is used the A/T will not allow speed reduction below "F" (or even "S") and so the only ways to fly at Vapp is using selected speed or manual thrust.

He/she may have taking a broad brush approach by saying this is required with all speed additive scenarios but thats not true.
Starbear is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.