Can you land a 744 safely in 1800 meters?
Thread Starter
Can you land a 744 safely in 1800 meters?
I am asking this question in this column because I am hoping to get some expert answers. The reason is because Qantas VH-OJA a 747-400 is about to be retired in to an aircraft museum located at Wollongong airport south of Sydney NSW Aus. The airport has a PAPI to runway 18 with small hills rising to about 200 feet at the end with no run off, makes it the only direction to land safely. Elevation is about 30 feet, runway lenght is 1800 meters.
I have no idea about performance figures but should I expect a few blown tyres on landing?
I have no idea about performance figures but should I expect a few blown tyres on landing?
Yes, with the right conditions. Cambridge, EGSC, sometimes receives BA 747s for maintenance, so they arrive at a low weight. Landing distances on the runway there are 1635m on 05 and 1747m on 23.
At 200T the landing distance on a dry runway, with no headwind is less than 1200m so it would have no problems.
I have landed one on 23 at Cambridge and it was no drama at all.
I have landed one on 23 at Cambridge and it was no drama at all.
I have landed one on 23 at Cambridge and it was no drama at all.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm wondering if the interior will be stripped of seats, galleys and IFE components. This will lighten it by a few tonnes.
The removal of blankets, pillows, safety cards, magazines, toilet paper, lifejackets, potable water, portable oxygen bottles, most door slides, etc, will also reduce the landing weight.
The removal of blankets, pillows, safety cards, magazines, toilet paper, lifejackets, potable water, portable oxygen bottles, most door slides, etc, will also reduce the landing weight.
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to Mr Boeing a B744, at max landing weight, can land on 6500 feet, given reasonable conditions and no serious unserviceability.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Indonesia
Age: 59
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From another thread :
.....and the incompetence amazes!
skianyn vannin
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: No longer The Gatwick Gulag
Age: 47
Posts: 181
The mediocrity continues
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: No longer The Gatwick Gulag
Age: 47
Posts: 181
The mediocrity continues
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have been in the RHS when landing at Cambridge with BA.
We landed on 23 and were almost able to vacate straight onto the taxiway into Marshalls without back track - about 1090 metres from thresh hold according to Google Earth- so had several 100's of metres to spare.
Flap 30, A/B 4, about 20 tonnes of fuel, so probably landed at about 215 tonnes, Vref about 130kts.
Regularly used to land at Melbourne 27 with about 2150 metres with pax and freight on board - quite tight but no drama.
It's often not landing on the length but taking off that can be more restrictive - this is not a consideration when the aircraft is not going to leave ever!
We landed on 23 and were almost able to vacate straight onto the taxiway into Marshalls without back track - about 1090 metres from thresh hold according to Google Earth- so had several 100's of metres to spare.
Flap 30, A/B 4, about 20 tonnes of fuel, so probably landed at about 215 tonnes, Vref about 130kts.
Regularly used to land at Melbourne 27 with about 2150 metres with pax and freight on board - quite tight but no drama.
It's often not landing on the length but taking off that can be more restrictive - this is not a consideration when the aircraft is not going to leave ever!
I always like the story of the C-97 flown into Dodgeville for retirement, a 2,800 foot dirt strip (and narrower than the landing gear track) 
Scroll down.
Abandoned & Little-Known Airfields: Southwestern Wisconsin
Scroll down.
Abandoned & Little-Known Airfields: Southwestern Wisconsin