Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Unusual PFD display on a Brand new A 321

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Unusual PFD display on a Brand new A 321

Old 25th Dec 2014, 07:22
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pineteam
FCTM gives some of this information and effect of wrong fuel or ZFW entrees. But coming back to the issue at hand this does not help because you didn't get Check GW message.
vilas is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2014, 09:42
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 380
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perfectly Normal people, As has been indicated by many above: Alpha Prot is a function of loading and to that end, it is indicated regardless of green dot.

This is an issue almost every time we enter a holding pattern and commence a turn at the same time, my personal minimum is to never fly in to a holding pattern at anything less than green dot plus ten knots.

It amazes me how many people are surprised by it. The FBW technology is good but far from perfect.
Willie Nelson is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2014, 03:08
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello Vilas,

Yes you are right, but I was just happy to discover something new.

To come back to the issue, yesterday I flew another A 321 quite heavy (over 80t) and at some point we were cruising at FL 320 at Mach 0.72 due to traffic ahead. Anyway and I could see the green dot sitting exactly on top of VLS ( VLS was there this time) and during turn at waypoint, the VLS was moving slightly up but the green dot was moving up also and never went below VLS at anytime.
That's why I'm a bit surprised.

I'm not saying you are wrong, I just never saw green dot going below VLS or worst Alpha prot before. Maybe it happens like Wille Nelson says in hold with steeper turn but I never noticed it. I'm still junior on type.

Next time I'm holding I will check that carefully.
pineteam is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2015, 23:14
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 380
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Happens all the time, particularly at high weights and altitude. It's a great plane but the FBW does not "prevent" the aircraft from being placed in aerodynamically undesirable situations it simply mitigates the likelihood.

As a bit of a segue on a related issue: the following incident indicated what occurs when an A319 is incredulously placed in to config full with gear down for the interception of a glideslope from 2100 feet at full flap in typhoon conditions.

The flight control protections on the Airbus are awesome but they're not able to defy the laws of physics:

Highlights: 3900 fpm in the wrong direction, stalled (74 knots) Commenced climb out after reaching 884 AGL at night in IMC and well below the glideslope.

http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rc...82001339,d.dGY
Willie Nelson is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2015, 12:14
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Asia
Age: 49
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Willie,
Not much is said about the performance of engine thust from what i read on the report, if thrust reaction is fast enough this event shouldn't occur, there is mention of the crews failure to advance thrust under low energy warning. The only explanation is that climb thrust was not enought to cope with the situation.
MD83FO is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2015, 10:44
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: FL390
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Loss of speed at 7kts/second according to the report. Even if it only takes 4 seconds to reach TOGA power that's still a loss of 28 knots starting at Vapp.


Certification is, I believe, in the order of 9 seconds from flight idle from when I did some high power ground runs a few years ago. That's potentially a loss of 63kts.
Fursty Ferret is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2015, 23:14
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 380
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MD83FO:

Not much is said about the performance of engine thrust from what i read on the report, if thrust reaction is fast enough this event shouldn't occur,
Fair point, notwithstanding, the crew should have been aware that thrust would sometimes be delayed and go straight to Airbus golden rule number 4 if necessary.

The thrust is sometimes slow as you say and perhaps this played a part, as fast as it might be though, no aircraft FBW or otherwise can defy the laws of physics.
Willie Nelson is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2015, 19:27
  #28 (permalink)  
bdcer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
OEB 48, condition 3, alpha prot jumping up 30kts in a manoeuvre.
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.