Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A320 PFD Symbols

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A320 PFD Symbols

Old 11th Dec 2014, 06:52
  #1 (permalink)  
ZFT
N4790P
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 73
Posts: 2,270
Received 25 Likes on 7 Posts
A320 PFD Symbols

We are having a debate here about whether the green normal law eyebrows on the PFD are a graphic representation of the 67 deg bank angle limit or not.

Cannot seem to locate any specific reference within FCOM.
ZFT is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2014, 07:58
  #2 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,302
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Hi,

DSC-31-40 C
in connection with
DSC-27-20-10-30 B
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2014, 08:30
  #3 (permalink)  
ZFT
N4790P
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 73
Posts: 2,270
Received 25 Likes on 7 Posts
Great. Thanks
ZFT is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2014, 07:08
  #4 (permalink)  
ZFT
N4790P
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 73
Posts: 2,270
Received 25 Likes on 7 Posts
FlightDetent

Our debate continued:

FYI Here is the FCOM at std1.6 Not what it now says. Perhaps explains the different views.

“The display shows the symbols in green:
  • · On the roll scale at +/- 67 deg to mark the bank angle limits
  • · On the pitch scale at 15 deg nose down or 30 deg nose up to mark the pitch limits.”

The current FCOM DSC-31-40 P4/32 item (5) uses the words (my italics)

“The display shows these symbols (=) in green
  • · On the roll scale to mark the bank angle protection availability.
  • · On the pitch scale at 15 deg nose down or 30 deg nose up to mark the pitch limits.”
ZFT is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2014, 23:20
  #5 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,302
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ZFT
FlightDetent

FYI Here is the FCOM at std1.6 Not what it now says. Perhaps explains the different views.

“The display shows the symbols in green:
  • · On the roll scale at +/- 67 deg to mark the bank angle limits
  • · On the pitch scale at 15 deg nose down or 30 deg nose up to mark the pitch limits.”
The current FCOM DSC-31-40 P4/32 item (5) uses the words (my italics)

“The display shows these symbols (=) in green
  • · On the roll scale to mark the bank angle protection availability.
  • · On the pitch scale at 15 deg nose down or 30 deg nose up to mark the pitch limits.”
Cheers ZFT


ok, let's have a look, to see if I make any sense and understood you correctly.

In the present wording, the reference to 67 bank "hard" limit is removed in lieu of explanation about B.A. prot. (my bolding in your quote above). No such re-phrase happened to the pitch article.

My FCOM has exactly the same wording as yours, under :
FCOM DSC-31-40 C INDICATIONS ON PFD, the bullet point #5 shows:

(5) Flight Control Protection Symbols
The display shows these symbols (=) in green:
• On the roll scale to mark the bank angle protection availability.
• On the pitch scale at 15 ° nose down or 30 ° nose up to mark the pitch limits.
An amber x replaces these symbols if the corresponding protection is lost.
(Refer to DSC-27-20-10-20 Protections - General)
Then I skip to DSC-27-20-10-30 B BANK ANGLE PROTECTION, the last sentence of the first paragraph says:[INDENT]If the pilot holds full lateral sidestick deflection, the bank angle goes to 67° and no further.

Last edited by FlightDetent; 14th Dec 2014 at 23:42.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2014, 23:40
  #6 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,302
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Haha, I see now I am not answering your original question at all. Back to square one.
  1. Yes, I believe the = bank protection marks are displayed at 67 degrees.
  2. No, I cannot find any reference in FCOM (present version) with the exact wording to declare so.
  3. To settle your argument - as long as former versions of FCOM and (unchanged) DMC standard numbers are not allowed as evidence, you would need a test:
    • fly the A/C to the bank angle limit and compare the position of the sky-pointer to the mark, or
    • put an angular ruler / protractor on the PFD. [at least one engine running most likely required]
Splitting hairs, are we not?

FD.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2014, 23:50
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just to confuse the situation slightly, the bank angle protections at 67 degrees are there because this equates to a load factor of 2.5g,(the certified load factor clean) now if flap is extended the load factor limit changes to 2g but do the limits move on the PFD? Discuss

Last edited by tubby linton; 15th Dec 2014 at 00:41.
tubby linton is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2014, 00:24
  #8 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,302
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
TL, thanks! Your gentle poke just helped me to find the answer to a Q I had (being a bookworm): why did AB change the wording in the first place?

Big respect to your knowledge.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2014, 02:14
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
tubby linton
It is a bank angle protection it has nothing to do with load factor. You cannot bank more than 67 degrees whatever be the load factor. Although it is true that if you do a turn with side stick fully deflected and maintaining altitude you will see +2.5 G.load factor displayed but that does not mean 67 degrees is always directly related to G.
vilas is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2014, 02:28
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ZFT
May be Airbus didn't find it necessary to repeat what is given in DSC-27-20-10-30 P 1/2 and 2/2 in chapter 31 which explains displays not necessarily limitations.



Last edited by vilas; 15th Dec 2014 at 02:52.
vilas is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2014, 03:46
  #11 (permalink)  
ZFT
N4790P
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 73
Posts: 2,270
Received 25 Likes on 7 Posts
FlightDetent,

There was certainly an element of hair splitting going on but was an interesting debate.

Vilas

Maybe so. But DSC-27-20-10-30 pg 1/2 std 1.7 has this sentence ....(indicated by a pair of green bar lines "=" on the PFD) at the end of the 1st paragraph.

Not there on std 1.8 FCOM
ZFT is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2014, 05:26
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ZFT
Yes I checked 1.7 that indication has been removed in later version. Never the less it still holds good.
vilas is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2014, 09:05
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Vilas, I would be surprised if you could obtain 67 degrees without getting to 2.5 g load factor. Would you explain why Airbus chose 67 degrees not 60.?Also if you have a load factor of 2.5 g before you obtain sixty seven degrees can you continue rolling and increasing load factor, which protection has priority?
tubby linton is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2014, 11:05
  #14 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,302
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Hi everybody,

to state the obvious, in a coordinated turn load factor relates to angle of bank with n=1/(cos(b.a.).

Here is my train of thought, please comment and fire at will:
  • The certified limit is 2,5g, just like any other aircraft.
  • In a coordinated turn, 2,5G is reached at 66,5 aob.
  • Airbus decided (hypothesis) to put a hard stop on bank at 67 deg aob, so in ideal conditions the load limit protection, aircraft certified limit, and bank angle protection intersect at a single point of the 4D situation.
  • The B.A. protection indicator "=" is shown on PFD at 67 degree mark, and this was clearly stated in the older FCOM versions.
  • There is no black magic about Airbus FBW. All is in the FCOM (somewhere ). Equally important is, what is not in the FCOM!
That was then, and this is now:

a) ZFT discovered that the wording have changed.
b) tubby linton points out, that with flaps out, the bank angle protection set at 67 deg AOB will not stop you from going beyond the certified (+2g) envelope. Personally I feel the FBW designers are way smarter than that.
c) villas reminds us that load factor protection should takes care of the g-loading limitations.

My questions then:
. with flaps out, will the load factor protection change its hard stop to 2g instead of 2,5?
. with flaps out, will the bank limit protection change its hard stop to 60 deg AOB (2 g in coordinated turn) instead of 67 ?

In case the answer to the second Q would be YES (another hypothesis), all snaps together:
- the new limiting angle being 60 deg, the position of green marks on PFD no longer represents where the protection activates;
- Airbus purifies the FCOM wording since ["protection stop" equals to 67°] is not really true at all times.

Last edited by FlightDetent; 15th Dec 2014 at 11:41.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2014, 15:03
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
tubby linton
In a 67 degrees bank you get 2.5g load factor provided you maintain altitude but if you just bank 67 degrees and allow the aircraft to descend as it will if you don't pull back, you won't get 2.5g. Merely rolling does not increase g you need elevator input to do that.
vilas is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2014, 15:58
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Vilas, thank you for the reminder. I try not to fly the bus to its bank angle limit .
PRO-SUP 27-20:
Steep turns can be made at up to 67 ° of bank. This is the steepest bank at which it is possible to maintain level flight at 2.5 g.

Last edited by tubby linton; 16th Dec 2014 at 00:18.
tubby linton is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.