Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Gravity fuel feeding A320

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Gravity fuel feeding A320

Old 23rd Apr 2014, 07:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Utopia
Age: 46
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gravity fuel feeding A320

Hi guys. Have a question regarding gravity fuel feeding ceiling. FCOM says that if the flight time above FL300 is less than 30 minutes(fuel non-deaerated), then the gravity fuel feeding ceiling is FL300. However, if you are on an easterly track, where FL300 is not an option, what would your gravity ceiling be? Would it be FL290, or do you have to descend all the way down to FL150? Would appreciate an answer. Thanks in advance!
CMpilot1 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2014, 07:35
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where on earth did you pluck FL150 from? Why not FL100?

If the limit is FL300, then any level up to and including FL300 is OK. So, FL290 is within that limit and is fine. Simples ....
TopBunk is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2014, 08:21
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Mumbai
Age: 34
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gravity feed ceiling

Flight time above FL 300 less than 30 min - FL 300

Aircraft flight level never exceeded FL 300 - FL 150, or 7 000 ft above takeoff
airport, whichever is higher


If you are on easterly track and flying FL 290 (not crossed FL 300 yet) then ceiling is FL 150 or 7000 ft above takeoff airport.

If on easterly track and flying something like FL 310 (less than 30 min above FL 300) then as ceiling is FL 300. As FL 300 is not available you may go down to FL 290. Here ceiling means the max FL at which gravity feed is possible. No worries if flying below max.
gAMbl3 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2014, 08:59
  #4 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone understand these posts from India?
BOAC is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2014, 08:59
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Utopia
Age: 46
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gravity fuel feeding

Top Bunk. FCOM says FL 100 for gravity fuel feeding if Jet B fuel is used. Otherwise it is FL 150. Thanks for your reply
CMpilot1 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2014, 09:05
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Utopia
Age: 46
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gravity fuel feeding

BOAC. This post is with respect to A320 family gravity fuel feeding. Refer PRO-ABN-28 p33/34
CMpilot1 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2014, 09:06
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Utopia
Age: 46
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
gaMBL3. Thanks.
CMpilot1 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2014, 09:45
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CMpilot1& gaMGle3
As the aircraft climbs the pressure is dropping and the air mixed in the fuel keeps bubbling out much the same way as beer going flat. The time it takes to climb to 30000ft plus 30mts all the air should have gone out but if the aircraft hasn't climbed to 30000ft or hasn't spent 30mts above 30000ft then there can be significant amount of air in the fuel. The only option available is to keep it under higher pressure to prevent the bubbling. That is achieved by descending to 15000ft or 30000ft in the later case. Anything below is even better.
vilas is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2014, 09:46
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Utopia
Age: 46
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
John Smith. FL290 is not FL300. I know that. So, my understanding is that if it were you, you would descent all the way to FL150 or below?

Last edited by CMpilot1; 23rd Apr 2014 at 10:20.
CMpilot1 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2014, 09:51
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Utopia
Age: 46
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vilas. Thanks for your reply. The A320 in question that experienced flame out-did it follow the FCOM gravity fuel feeding procedure?
CMpilot1 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2014, 09:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CMpilot1
I had slightly misunderstood your question so I changed the reply. If you never went to 300 then you need to go down to 150 but if you were cruising higher than FL300 then you descent to FL300 if not possible then 290 is fine.

Last edited by vilas; 23rd Apr 2014 at 10:05.
vilas is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2014, 10:19
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Utopia
Age: 46
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vilas. Thanks. So your take is FL290 is alright. Copied that..
CMpilot1 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2014, 11:22
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: A few degrees South
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This must be a darn complicated aircraft what you guys are flying..
latetonite is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2014, 13:38
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: farmm intersection, our ranch
Age: 57
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On any heading, your limitation is FL300. What FL is available is strictly between you and ATC.
flyingchanges is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2014, 17:42
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Utopia
Age: 46
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
flyingchanges. The definition of ceiling according to dictionary is 'an upper limit'. So, in this case, as long as you don't bust FL300, which is the ceiling(upper limit)you are alright. I have started looking at the gravity ceiling with a different perspective now. Thanks to everyone who contributed.
CMpilot1 is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2014, 03:30
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Chennai,India
Age: 34
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry for digressing ever so slightly from the subject
I had a discussion with one of my colleagues about the consequences of starting your engines with Fuel pumps OFF. To my surprise he said, its no big deal and that the engines would start normally as they would be fed by gravity( Gravity fuel feed ceiling being FL150) . I have not seen any literature which approves this viewpoint. Has anyone ever accidentally tried switching on the engines without fuel pumps running ?

Last edited by Bkdoss; 24th Apr 2014 at 06:58.
Bkdoss is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2014, 05:05
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: farmm intersection, our ranch
Age: 57
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is your battery start procedure.
flyingchanges is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2014, 06:40
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bkdoss
Engines starts without fuel pumps but there will be ECAM warning. There was an incident when both engines were started with fuel pumps off and ECAM warnings were cleared without even noticing the warning. Crew climbed to FL380 when both engines flamed out. They relit engines and landed back. You do not seem to understand gravity feed limitations. Descent is made to 150 to prevent vapour lock, you do not climb to 150. Lower is better. Read my earlier post.
vilas is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2014, 06:57
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Chennai,India
Age: 34
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vilas
What I meant was that since the ceiling is FL150, and almost all the airports I can think of being at an altitude lower than that, Fuel pumps should feed by gravity . I didn't mean that the aircraft has to climb to FL 150
Bkdoss is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2014, 07:03
  #20 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why are we bothering with engine start? 'Gravity feed' limitations normally refer to high power settings, not idle.

For the benefit of the rest of us, what caused all this chat? Did an AB flame out? Any report?
BOAC is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.