Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A320 Cost Index

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A320 Cost Index

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Feb 2013, 19:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Playing Golf!
Age: 46
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320 Cost Index

Hi,

Does anyone have any further information regarding the cost index on the A320 family?

I have read the FCOM and the Airbus getting to grips with cost index...

But specifically, a table of a given cost index vs the target mach number, and how much % wise the aircraft can "drift" from this target due to wind?

Just to further my own knowledge!

Thanks in advance!

Last edited by PT6A; 10th Feb 2013 at 19:42.
PT6A is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2013, 04:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Uh... Where was I?
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are tables, "somewhere" in the fcoms, for various CIs and winds and weights.
Microburst2002 is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2013, 11:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question for you Micro while we're at it (if you don't mind) -

Changing CI from 18 to 0 in CRZ results in a slightly higher REC MAX but
can you tell me if the margin is reduced or not? I get the impression it is.

On the Prog page with 18 - 350 350 363 / with 0 - 350 355 369

Looked up the speeds in FCOM and I calculate from 363 to 369 the margin
reduces by 2 knots.

Assuming I'm correct - why would the buffer reduce for the same GW?
Slasher is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2013, 16:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The buffer is G related. It is 1.3g and it does not change with CI choices. To put perspective on this a 30 degree bank turn is 1.15G and light turbulence is 1.05 to 1.1G.
Canuckbirdstrike is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2013, 18:31
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is 1.3g and it does not change with CI choices.
Well that's what I've always thought. Look up the speeds for 1G stalls clean.
Slasher is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2013, 21:26
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Playing Golf!
Age: 46
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got the data! I forgot the PEP had it in the enroute planning tab
PT6A is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2013, 00:19
  #7 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,187
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
Prefer not to close threads unless you have a specific reason to do so. Others may find the commentary useful.
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2013, 04:20
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Uh... Where was I?
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
buffet limit is not CI related

The REC MAX gives a .2 g margin, I think.

I can't see why it changes with CI
Microburst2002 is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2013, 04:47
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.2G buffer translated into a speed margin in the 1.0G case Micro.

I can't see why it would change with a reduction of CI either.

Never mind. I'm hardly ever up that high anyway.
Slasher is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2013, 08:54
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: pre-dep area
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
REC MAX gives you .3G buffet margin, but you can choose a FL higher than that limited by .2G margin
capt. solipsist is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2013, 11:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: here, there, everywhere
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the FCOM:

RECOMMENDED MAXIMUM ALTITUDE (REC MAX)

The recommended maximum altitude is the lowest of the maximum altitude that:
    So, it's not only about buffet margin, but also performance-related. My guess is that with lower CI the a/c flies at lower speed, thus is able to maintain it (or climb) using less thrust - hence higher REC MAX FL...
    Stuck_in_an_ATR is offline  
    Old 12th Feb 2013, 18:01
      #12 (permalink)  
    Thread Starter
     
    Join Date: Apr 2008
    Location: Playing Golf!
    Age: 46
    Posts: 1,037
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    Do you want me to run some tables from the PEP for you guys? It shows everything in far more detail than the FCOM
    PT6A is offline  

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are Off
    Pingbacks are Off
    Refbacks are Off



    Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

    Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.