A330 ZFW/ZFCG DISAGREE
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ME
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A330 ZFW/ZFCG DISAGREE
Could someone enlighten me, what this ECAM message means?
Ok, FCOM says: "One FCMC detects that the ZFW or ZFCG data from FMGEC 1 and FMGEC 2 disagree". Still doesn't make much sense to me. Disagree with what?
Ok, FCOM says: "One FCMC detects that the ZFW or ZFCG data from FMGEC 1 and FMGEC 2 disagree". Still doesn't make much sense to me. Disagree with what?
Last edited by Romasik; 12th Jan 2013 at 17:51.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ME
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, we clear it, we reinsert it - no problem
But, the question remains: what data does the FCMC compare with inserted data? How does the aicraft know what is right or wrong???
But, the question remains: what data does the FCMC compare with inserted data? How does the aicraft know what is right or wrong???
Jesus it's an Airbus so who knows what it's thinking or doing.
Try cycling the Left Landing light, that usually fixes most problems on the Bus!!
Who knows what is connected to what in this thing.
Seriously we see this message a lot after entering the MACZFW/ZFW when we get the loadsheet and the data is always checked ok twice to make sure of no finger trouble....
So who knows........
Try cycling the Left Landing light, that usually fixes most problems on the Bus!!
Who knows what is connected to what in this thing.
Seriously we see this message a lot after entering the MACZFW/ZFW when we get the loadsheet and the data is always checked ok twice to make sure of no finger trouble....
So who knows........
Last edited by nitpicker330; 13th Jan 2013 at 11:09.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Planned ZFW
Have you already entered a "planned" ZFW ? If so , i think it is just questioning why you have changed this again as you enter the actual value from the loadsheet.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: W of 30W
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Romasik
"One FCMC detects that the ZFW or ZFCG data from FMGEC 1 and FMGEC 2 disagree".
Still doesn't make much sense to me. Disagree with what?
Still doesn't make much sense to me. Disagree with what?
Confirm that the ZFW and ZFCG values from each FMGC are the same as the loadsheet value.
Maybe the figures inserted through one MCDU are different from the one previously inserted through the other unit.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ME
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BTW, today we gave it a try: entered completely crazy CG data (30% instead of 21% from the loadsheet) and DIDN'T GET ANY MESSAGE... And the stab trim set itself based on that figure from the moon...
So, it doesn't protect from the crew entry mistakes. What the hell is the meaning and the purpose???
So, it doesn't protect from the crew entry mistakes. What the hell is the meaning and the purpose???
Last edited by Romasik; 3rd Feb 2013 at 18:15.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ME
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With each other.
Confirm that the ZFW and ZFCG values from each FMGC are the same as the loadsheet value.
Maybe the figures inserted through one MCDU are different from the one previously inserted through the other unit.
We only insert it in one MCDU and sometimes get the message...
Confirm that the ZFW and ZFCG values from each FMGC are the same as the loadsheet value.
Maybe the figures inserted through one MCDU are different from the one previously inserted through the other unit.
We only insert it in one MCDU and sometimes get the message...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ME
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mutley320
Have you already entered a "planned" ZFW ? If so , i think it is just questioning why you have changed this again as you enter the actual value from the loadsheet.
Nope. We don't enter anything in advance. Only the actual data from the loadsheet.
Have you already entered a "planned" ZFW ? If so , i think it is just questioning why you have changed this again as you enter the actual value from the loadsheet.
Nope. We don't enter anything in advance. Only the actual data from the loadsheet.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: W of 30W
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did you notice if the message is showing after you inserted the fuel figure but the fuel is not yet on board ?
I understand you have the on ground auto trim setup option, would you have an option for the aircraft to estimate its CG through the landing gear ?
I believe the best option would be to directly question Airbus through your management. This is a very interesting question.
I understand you have the on ground auto trim setup option, would you have an option for the aircraft to estimate its CG through the landing gear ?
I believe the best option would be to directly question Airbus through your management. This is a very interesting question.
Last edited by CONF iture; 13th Jan 2013 at 13:12.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ME
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did you notice if the message is showing after you inserted the fuel figure but the fuel is not yet on board ?
I understand you have the on ground auto trim setup option, would you have an option for the aircraft to estimate its CG through the landing gear ?
I believe the best option would be to directly question Airbus through your management. This is a very interesting question.
The fuel is done, ready to go, inserting ZFW/ZFWCG and sometimes getting the message, sometimes not. Today absolutely wild CG didn't trigger any message... and the stab trim set itself automatically accordingly that wild entry.
Looks like there is nothing there to measure the actual CG. We only enter the starting point and then the FCMC calculates CG change with fuel movement and carries on the initial entry mistake, if any. But the ECAM message and its explanation in the FCOM are totally confusing and don't fall in line with my understanding of the system.
I understand you have the on ground auto trim setup option, would you have an option for the aircraft to estimate its CG through the landing gear ?
I believe the best option would be to directly question Airbus through your management. This is a very interesting question.
The fuel is done, ready to go, inserting ZFW/ZFWCG and sometimes getting the message, sometimes not. Today absolutely wild CG didn't trigger any message... and the stab trim set itself automatically accordingly that wild entry.
Looks like there is nothing there to measure the actual CG. We only enter the starting point and then the FCMC calculates CG change with fuel movement and carries on the initial entry mistake, if any. But the ECAM message and its explanation in the FCOM are totally confusing and don't fall in line with my understanding of the system.
Last edited by Romasik; 18th Feb 2013 at 15:06.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: W of 30W
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unfortunately it's easier to get the answer on the forum rather then through management
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 76
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is just a communication error between computers... On the ground the pilots are the source of ZFW + ZFWCG information for FMGEC's and therefore the FCMC's, which send the GW values back to FMGEC....so it is important to cross check the correct value each side.
Once airborne the FE portion of the FMGEC does some smart calculations to cross check the GW values and warns you if there is an error.
These glitches happen - the important question is what should you check?
Once airborne the FE portion of the FMGEC does some smart calculations to cross check the GW values and warns you if there is an error.
These glitches happen - the important question is what should you check?
Interesting stuff.
I've only seen this after I've done a manual loadsheet on an A330, and got the ZFW index and %MAC figures slightly wrong or misread them in the badly lit cockpit, and which would have led to an incorrect THS setting for T/O.
However, the very senior training captain I was with once when it happened, didn't know what it meant !!
I've only seen this after I've done a manual loadsheet on an A330, and got the ZFW index and %MAC figures slightly wrong or misread them in the badly lit cockpit, and which would have led to an incorrect THS setting for T/O.
However, the very senior training captain I was with once when it happened, didn't know what it meant !!
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: somewhere
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ZFW/ZFCG DISAGREE
the important question is what should you check?
Check the 'Abnormal and emergency procedures' ATA 28 section in FCOM
it says:
"Confirm that the ZFW and ZFCG values from each FMGC are the same as the loadsheet value."
Strange as only some of our new A330's give this message.
Our SOP is to insert 25/ZFW and Block Fuel as we setup the Perf initially from the Flight Plan.
Then later with the loadsheet we enter the actual data into the PF's and the PM checks his CDU at the same time as we move through final setup.
The message then pops up instantly the data is inserted even though both screens show the same figures???
I've never seen an error.
Our SOP is to insert 25/ZFW and Block Fuel as we setup the Perf initially from the Flight Plan.
Then later with the loadsheet we enter the actual data into the PF's and the PM checks his CDU at the same time as we move through final setup.
The message then pops up instantly the data is inserted even though both screens show the same figures???
I've never seen an error.
Last edited by nitpicker330; 15th Jan 2013 at 04:47.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: somewhere
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ZFW/ZFCG DISAGREE
The entered values are used for GW/GWCG calculation by FMGEC and FCMC.
The FCMC calculations are used for CG control and is the primary source for FM and FG.
The FMGEC values is the backup source for FM, FG and is primarly used for AFT CG monitoring.
(as watchdog for FCMC CG control)
Now if there is any difference between the ZFW/ZFCG values in FCMC and FMGEC (No W&B system fitted),
this message will be triggerd to check and confirm by reentering the values.
The FCMC calculations are used for CG control and is the primary source for FM and FG.
The FMGEC values is the backup source for FM, FG and is primarly used for AFT CG monitoring.
(as watchdog for FCMC CG control)
Now if there is any difference between the ZFW/ZFCG values in FCMC and FMGEC (No W&B system fitted),
this message will be triggerd to check and confirm by reentering the values.
