PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 29th Dec 2012, 15:12   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: here
Posts: 8
Remote Controlled Flying of Modern Airliner?

I'm sorry if this is not the right forum for this question. In another forum, it has been stated that a Boeing 737NG, for example, could be flown and landed remotely from the ground in the event of a hypothetical flight crew emergency. Is this at all possible?

Thanks.

Last edited by dmwalker; 29th Dec 2012 at 15:14.
dmwalker is offline   Reply
Old 29th Dec 2012, 15:23   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In some hotel downroute or in some hotel doing union negotiations.
Posts: 2,367
No, it is not possible.
Denti is offline   Reply
Old 29th Dec 2012, 17:22   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,339
Certainly not all variants/equipage...but...

"Could" is your question...and "at all possible"

So the answer is yes.
FlightPathOBN is offline   Reply
Old 29th Dec 2012, 17:56   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 3,364
Quote:
Certainly not all variants/equipage...but...
No, not ANY current varient or "equipage".

Could one be built with existing technology? sure!

Does one exist?

No.
Wizofoz is offline   Reply
Old 29th Dec 2012, 18:25   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,339
Actually, it has been done...
FlightPathOBN is offline   Reply
Old 29th Dec 2012, 19:41   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: here
Posts: 8
Would you say that it has been done experimentally with a specially equipped aircraft but there is not enough interest to justify developing it further?
dmwalker is offline   Reply
Old 29th Dec 2012, 19:45   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Amman
Posts: 18
It hasn't been done

I have looked in to this extensively, I found no evidence of any jetliner being controlled remotely, however I stand to be corrected
raraa is offline   Reply
Old 29th Dec 2012, 20:02   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gold Coast
Age: 47
Posts: 1,612
Quote:
I have looked in to this extensively, I found no evidence of any jetliner being controlled remotely, however I stand to be corrected
There's been a small handful that have been fitted with radio control gear for the purposes of deliberate crash testing (707, 727 spring to mind) but there are precisely zero airliners in service that have any gear like that.
18-Wheeler is offline   Reply
Old 29th Dec 2012, 20:06   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,339
enough said.
FlightPathOBN is offline   Reply
Old 29th Dec 2012, 21:23   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somewhere someplace.....
Posts: 180
You can put servos in to push and pull on primary controls, but it's the levers, switches and years of experience and seat of the pants feel you simply cannot engineer into an R/C system.



Yet.

Last edited by Dash&Thump; 29th Dec 2012 at 21:23.
Dash&Thump is offline   Reply
Old 29th Dec 2012, 21:28   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,339
RNP transition to a GBAS CAT III 0/0 autoland, autobrakes, auto reverse...
not much needed at all....

Last edited by FlightPathOBN; 29th Dec 2012 at 21:28.
FlightPathOBN is offline   Reply
Old 29th Dec 2012, 22:32   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 69
Security drawback

One of many difficulties is that it would be phenomenally difficult to guarantee that an airliner equipped with remote control could not be radio-hijacked (assuming it was designed to allow remote override of even the pilots). Obviously you'd want to encrypt any such radio control, but you then have to solve a lot of key distribution and origin authentication problems. That's something that no one else has wholly adequate answers to just yet.

A small diversion off topic: The shuttle could be remote controlled all the way back down from orbit. It emerged during the inquiry into the Challenger disaster that the only thing that had to be done by the pilot was to lower the landing gear. They subsequently made gear lowering r/c too after the insightful Richard Feynman queried the lack of consistency.
msbbarratt is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:43.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".