PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 9th Sep 2012, 12:53   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Heaven on earth
Posts: 8
jepperson approach plates legal requirements

Hi everyone,
Just wondering. What are the requirements for approah plates on board an aircraft without EFB???? must both pilots have the original copy or can either have a photo-copied version provided an original is onboard??? I hope this is the appropriate forum for this discussion.
ANSALONI is offline   Reply
Old 9th Sep 2012, 14:20   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 88
1 needs to be on board, photocopy is fine even without original (we print them from a computer, which in effect is a copy).
JeroenC is offline   Reply
Old 9th Sep 2012, 15:53   #3 (permalink)
Transparency International
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Köln
Posts: 624
You are required to have available the information necessary for the planned flight, inclusive whatever alternate planning you have made.

Your operations manual may specify what vendor to use but wether you chose [insert any company here] it remains your responsibility that the information is current and valid for your flight.

The question about photocopy or "original" could possibly end up being one about copyright, but none of the private vendors are approved for anything - except when they deliver data to your FMC navigation database.
dusk2dawn is offline   Reply
Old 9th Sep 2012, 18:40   #4 (permalink)
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 16,895
Be careful with 'photocopies' - an eagle-eyed Flt Ops inspector MIGHT deduce that these are 'uncontrolled' ie not amended to a fixed plan and that 'old' copies could sit around on the flight deck.
BOAC is offline   Reply
Old 11th Sep 2012, 01:06   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,350
I get all my Jepp plates from PPRuNe!!!

Thats okay, right?
FlightPathOBN is offline   Reply
Old 12th Sep 2012, 00:57   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 3,685
Of course it is! The only catch is ensuring 'net access during the approach. That was a bit of an issue for me so now I just use M$ Flight Sim. As a flight planning tool it's not bad either. Why, it wouldn't surprise me if you couldn't plan across the pond with it...

Last edited by Tinstaafl; 12th Sep 2012 at 00:58.
Tinstaafl is offline   Reply
Old 12th Sep 2012, 14:48   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 2,703
Both pilots don't need a copy of the plate either. Just a single copy of the current one has to be on board so, for instance, a pilot flying could brief from a single plate, then hand it to the pilot monitoring for the approach.
Checkboard is offline   Reply
Old 11th Apr 2013, 12:29   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: India
Posts: 243


Can somebody please explain as to why RVR and visibility are mentioned. What is the significance?

Isn't the visibility reported in RVR below 1500m.

Thank you in advance.
SuperflyTNT is offline   Reply
Old 12th Apr 2013, 00:17   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 60
Posts: 2,260
No, it could be reported as viz or RVR, depending on airport facilities operative or available.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline   Reply
Old 12th Apr 2013, 06:54   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: India
Posts: 243
So why has it been given twice here as RVR 550m and VIS 800m. Which one is the pilot supposed to follow while shooting the approach?
SuperflyTNT is offline   Reply
Old 12th Apr 2013, 07:16   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Not Here
Posts: 45
RVR-VIS

Well its a very good question. Instead of asking the question, why not look up the answer. Do your self a favor and learn the information that is located in the Jeppesen 'General' section of the Airway Manual. Instead of putting your feet up, reading the newspaper or the latest edition of GQ, do some work.

If you were working with me on a long haul flight you might learn a thing or two.
80-87 is offline   Reply
Old 12th Apr 2013, 08:09   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: India
Posts: 243
Well I did read what Jeppesen has to say about it and didn't quite fully understand it. Which is exactly why I posted my question here. Sadly, I'm not working with you on a long haul flight which is why I'm trying to learn off here. Thanks for your advice in any case.

Jeppesen states that - "RVR visibility values are charted only when the value is not the same as the prevailing or meteorological visibility value. When a difference occurs, the respective RVR and prevailing or meteorological values are prefixed with 'RVR' and 'VIS'. When there is no difference, the minimum is shown only once and means either RVR (if RVR is reported for that runway) or visibility if measured otherwise."
SuperflyTNT is offline   Reply
Old 12th Apr 2013, 09:16   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 278
Quote:
If you were working with me on a long haul flight you might learn a thing or two.
Wow...where do I sign? That sounds like a cracking day out.
john_smith is offline   Reply
Old 12th Apr 2013, 09:48   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 214
Transmisometers can break. Thats why there is a vis reading. Don't know if its company specific but there are also tables to determine how to convert rvr into vis and vv.
Airmann is offline   Reply
Old 12th Apr 2013, 11:13   #15 (permalink)
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 16,895
Quote:
Wow...where do I sign? That sounds like a cracking day out.
- indeed - put me down on the list too. I need a challenge every now and then. I'll even bring my own rolled-up newspaper.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Airmann
Transmisometers can break. Thats why there is a vis reading.
- ok, accepted. Now explain why every plate does not have them?
BOAC is offline   Reply
Old 12th Apr 2013, 12:41   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,297
If ATC quote Vis then you need 800m if they quote RVR you need 550m

nitpicker330 is offline   Reply
Old 12th Apr 2013, 23:01   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth Australia
Age: 69
Posts: 179
Cool

It took 16 posts to get the answer?

PPRuNe is a sad place at times, full of crud from trolls and joksters.

greybeard is offline   Reply
Old 13th Apr 2013, 07:15   #18 (permalink)
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 16,895
Regrettably, greybeard, now 17 posts and no proper answer! nitpickers answer is of course correct but the query from 'superfly' was 'why do you require a greater vis. without RVR at that airfield'? We still do not know. Have you actually looked at any current Jepp charts?

Most of the UK ILS charts quote only 'RVRxxxm'. We all (hopefully) know about converting met vis to RVR, so as long as generally you have a met vis of at least 550m you are ok for CATI. Why then is it necessary to publish a met vis? 800m is actually the visual approach minimum RVR, and why the quoted chart requires an equivalent RVR of at least 800m I know not. Do you?

Is this purely an 'Indian' thing? Does this appear on any European charts? I recall (going back a bit!) Pristina used to have only a met vis minimum for the ILS 35 which I think WAS 800m.

Aterpster?
BOAC is offline   Reply
Old 13th Apr 2013, 08:13   #19 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: India
Posts: 243
The above picture/screen shot that I added is from the Jepp lengend manual. So, my guess is its not just an Indian thing. But, I have seen RVR and VIS being reported in quite a few current Indian approach charts.

Nitpickers answer seems to be the most favourable right now. But, visibility is reported in RVR below 1500m, why is VIS here stated at 800m ?
SuperflyTNT is offline   Reply
Old 13th Apr 2013, 09:06   #20 (permalink)
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 16,895
OK - my initial response then is that it is simply a Jepp 'presentation' issue for the legend page, but you say you have seen it on other charts? Can you image one for me or give me locators?
BOAC is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 22:39.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".