PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 23rd May 2012, 09:56   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Paris
Posts: 17
Relative Humidity

Hi all,

I wonder how do you consider relative humidity for take off computations?

Relative Humidity, especially at high temperature, would reduce air density and thus take off performances.
I think about it especially for operations in the Gulf during summer season, with very high temperatures (>40°C) and high relative humidity (80%).

I did not see any performance computation requesting RH and I do not remember if SCAP modules allowfor Relative Humity input .

Is this included in QNH?

Thanks in advance for your help!

Zolas
Finzolas is offline   Reply
Old 23rd May 2012, 10:23   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,189
I always thought Relative Humidity was the sweat that drips off your chin when making love to your sister...
anotherthing is offline   Reply
Old 23rd May 2012, 10:25   #3 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,597
This has been covered recently in another thread.
Slasher is offline   Reply
Old 23rd May 2012, 11:12   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,076
Hi Zolas,

Air Density Calculator
Difference between 0% / 100% relative humidity is about 1% in air density.
That will be reflected in the QNH.
rudderrudderrat is offline   Reply
Old 24th May 2012, 00:39   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,884
Don't quote me on this, but my recollection is that AFM performance chapter assumes 80% RH; In dryer air, you might be able to do a bit better than the book. Worst case, 100% RH, a tiny bit worse.
barit1 is offline   Reply
Old 24th May 2012, 00:48   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,884
rudderrudderrat:
Quote:
Difference between 0% / 100% relative humidity is about 1% in air density.
True. H2O vapor is lighter than the average air molecule which it displaces. (2xH=2; O=16; total = 18.
2xO=32; 2xN=28; the mixture averages about 29)

Quote:
That will be reflected in the QNH.
Nope. QNH reflects pressure, not density (which is a function of pressure & temperature as well as H2O content.)
barit1 is offline   Reply
Old 24th May 2012, 08:25   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,076
Hi barit1,
Quote:
Nope. QNH reflects pressure, not density
I agree.
However, do you think a parcel of less dense air will remain stationary in the atmosphere? If you agree that it will rise, then the local surface pressure will fall.

edit: Density Altitude Calculator - English/Metric
It's interesting to note that, "Calculations using dew-point are often more accurate than those using relative humidity because the dew point is fairly constant for a given air mass and changes very little until another air mass arrives, while the relative humidity varies greatly as the ambient temperature changes."

& "The ICAO International Standard Atmosphere standard conditions for zero density altitude are 0 meters (0 feet) altitude, 15 deg C (59 deg F) air temp, 1013.25 mb (29.921 in Hg) pressure and 0 % relative humidity (no water vapor in the air). "

Last edited by rudderrudderrat; 24th May 2012 at 19:21.
rudderrudderrat is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:59.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".