PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 4th Apr 2012, 04:12   #1 (permalink)


Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: cincinnati area
Posts: 1
Early 747 Wing Gear

O.K., just having a discussion about various speed brake systems and someone mentioned that they thought early 747's had the ability to extend the wing gear only, possibly as a speed brake. That immediately reminded me of something I had forgotten. Growing up not far from ORD in Chicago, in the early 70's, we lived under what was a fairly commonly used traffic pattern for certain runway configurations, so on some days, we would have lots of traffic passing over the house, including a pretty good amount of 747's. I remembered that is was fairly common to see them flying with the wing gear only extended. I have also seen photos of the gear handle on early 74's with a wing gear only postion. So my question is, does anyone know what the purpose was of operation with the wing gear only extended? Was it actually some type of speed brake device? As I said, I just remebered this and know I'm very curious.
thrustipod is offline   Reply
Old 4th Apr 2012, 04:24   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gold Coast
Age: 47
Posts: 1,612
I don't think so, because if you want speed brakes there's a speed brake lever in the cockpit for you to use.
It is possible, however, to extend each gear individually by the alternate system. That's only for emergencies though.
18-Wheeler is offline   Reply
Old 4th Apr 2012, 08:18   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: A tropical island.
Posts: 377
Don't recall hearing this about the 747 at any point. The DC7, though, was equipped to do this (and was approved as such).

Gravel kitted 737s can do this, though, it's not approved.
aviatorhi is offline   Reply
Old 4th Apr 2012, 10:51   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 702
That is correct. About 30 years ago the detent on the gear lever, labelled "wing gear only" as I recall it, was blanked off initially and completely removed shortly thereafter.

Think about the human factors here - "gear down", oh dear, I meant the lot as the aircraft nose settles onto the concrete. Besides, it was as noisy as all Hell in use.
mustafagander is offline   Reply
Old 4th Apr 2012, 10:58   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tickawarra
Posts: 77
The first 747-100,s did have a wing gear speed brake detent.It was removed because they had a problem losing gear doors.
Yobbo is offline   Reply
Old 4th Apr 2012, 13:21   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gold Coast
Age: 47
Posts: 1,612
Well there you go!
Thanks for that bit of trivia gents.
18-Wheeler is offline   Reply
Old 4th Apr 2012, 15:23   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Smogsville
Posts: 1,147
Here it is, just under the OFF selection.

Photos: Boeing 747-131 Aircraft Pictures | Airliners.net
SMOC is online now   Reply
Old 6th Apr 2012, 19:41   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 479
Reminds me of the good old G1. The speedbrakes were the ability to extend the main gear only.
JammedStab is online now   Reply
Old 6th Apr 2012, 19:42   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 479
Quote:
Originally Posted by aviatorhi View Post
Don't recall hearing this about the 747 at any point. The DC7, though, was equipped to do this (and was approved as such).

Gravel kitted 737s can do this, though, it's not approved.
Gravel-kitted 737's can do what?
JammedStab is online now   Reply
Old 30th Apr 2012, 07:21   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: A tropical island.
Posts: 377
Quote:
Gravel-kitted 737's can do what?
The drag, at high speeds, on the nose gear assembly (with the gravel deflector) is such that the nose gear will not extend but the main gear will.
aviatorhi is offline   Reply
Old 30th Apr 2012, 08:28   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hongkong
Posts: 138
SOP

The 'gear lever to off' before full flap retraction-which if not no an SOP is still good practice-was to ensure that if you did inadvertently drop the wing gear placing the lever 'off' (going through off) giving extra drag, you weren't clean and still had some high lift device deployed especially at heavy weights. Been there done that!

S

See the photo-it's not difficult to cock-up.
Sygyzy is offline   Reply
Old 30th Apr 2012, 09:04   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Smaller Antipode
Age: 78
Posts: 876
SMOC - thanks for the picture, brings back memories, and yes, we too had that configuration ( tho' not the 'tape' eng. instruments ) including the finger slicing bacon slicer blade that one had to move aside if performing an alternate gear raising procedure. It was there to stop the gear being raised if the trucks weren't level so that one didn't graunch the wheel well access by forcing an off centre gear up into the hole. ( I think ? memory ? ) If all was well the blade moved out of the way and let the gear handle go right up to the UP position.

I have no recollection of why we had the wing gear position, never used it. We had a procedure for landing with one wing gear not extended, but not a main gear. (IIRC)

Last edited by ExSp33db1rd; 30th Apr 2012 at 09:31.
ExSp33db1rd is offline   Reply
Old 30th Apr 2012, 11:06   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 479
Quote:
Originally Posted by aviatorhi View Post
The drag, at high speeds, on the nose gear assembly (with the gravel deflector) is such that the nose gear will not extend but the main gear will.
Perhaps but no pilot following the aircraft limitations will have experienced this as the max gear speed is 180 knots. In other words, all three gear always extend at the same time during normal operations on a gravel equipped 737. Sounds like a way to damage the nosegear deflector.
JammedStab is online now   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:55.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".