Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

All metal livery Cargo planes

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

All metal livery Cargo planes

Old 4th Mar 2011, 16:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All metal livery Cargo planes

Hi folks,

I would like to seek your opinion as to why do certain 744 cargo planes come in an all-metal livery i.e Cathay,JAL?Is it due to the fact that doing so might be able to save a significant amount of weight which translates to better fuel economics?

Best Regards,
Vibes
Vibes is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2011, 17:16
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

That was the plan but it costs more to maintain them that way, so now the paint is left on again.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2011, 17:18
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: sfo
Age: 70
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JAL had one classic freighter in bare metal as an experiment, and didn't strip any others. However, when the 400Fs arrived, they were bare metal. The -400BCFs were painted.

Bare metal does save some weight, (I've heard up to 600 pounds) but whether that is significant is up to argument. Due to skin color variations, they look better if they are matched by Boeing when built, rather than pick one at random and strip it.
sb_sfo is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2011, 17:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read somewhere that the weight of paint on a 747 is around 375 kg..
rotornut is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2011, 21:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've heard pros and cons. Paint can act as a filler, smoothing skin joints for some advantage in profile drag. Whether this overcomes the weight difference - who knows?
barit1 is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2011, 23:09
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 84
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To Paint Or Not

To paint or not paint the fuselage is open to debate. The paint does add weight to the aircraft, depending on size, 300 to 600 pounds. If the aircraft remains unpainted, the aluminum skin, typically, Aluminum alloy 2024 (Aluminum & copper) - Good fatigue performance, fracture toughness and slow crack propagation rate, will oxidize over time, giving the appearance of not being well maintained. American Airlines has an unpainted fuselage fleet, but polishes their aircraft to keep them bright and shiny. Some claim the cost to do this outweighs the cost to have a painted fleet, eliminating the fuel savings advantage. So for pure cargo freighters, if you don't care about appearance, unpainted planes will save fuel in the long run, but, will not look very nice as the aluminum ages (oxidizes). Note: The wings are painted and use a different aluminum alloy than the fuselage for various reasons.

Turbine D
Turbine D is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2011, 00:12
  #7 (permalink)  
bearfoil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I had a friend who had a Swift. He was obsessive about the Shine. He crashed and burned on TO at Tahoe a few years back. We missed him at the coffee shop due all his rubbin' and burnishin'. In the scheme of things, Shiny is not a priority.

Aluminum? They still build A/C out of Aluminum?? Paint the resin, or lose it to the Tap Man. (Preferably White, cuz SPF 100 is expensive).

bear
 
Old 5th Mar 2011, 06:52
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: asia
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the Horse's Mouth

Cathay Pacific “silver bullet” freighter takes to the skies

17 May 2006

Cathay Pacific Airways’ first “silver bullet” freighter, stripped bare of most of its paint, goes into service tomorrow (Thursday) as part of an innovative airline initiative that asked staff for ideas to cut spiralling fuel costs.

Less weight reduces aircraft fuel burn. The polished silver fuselage makes a Boeing 747 about 200 kg lighter and will shave about HK$2.8 million from the airline's annual fuel bill when implemented across the 14-strong freighter fleet. Virtually the entire aircraft body has been stripped bare, with the exception of the tail and a strip along the aircraft’s nose to maintain the airline’s identity.

Ultimately all 14 freighter aircraft in the Cathay Pacific fleet will undergo the transformation. They will get the new look when they undergo a scheduled maintenance overhaul over the next couple of years. The full livery on passenger aircraft will remain unchanged.
Cathay Pacific ?silver bullet? freighter takes to the skies
stickyb is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2011, 09:03
  #9 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,178
Received 92 Likes on 61 Posts
Less weight reduces aircraft fuel burn

... and equals more payload (unless there is some payload limitation preventing that) = more revenue = same fuel burn ?

Marketing hype and increased maintenance costs.
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2011, 21:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: melbourne australia
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read that howard hughes had an unpainted DC4 that was seldom flown and always left outside
eventually the new owner had to spend a fortune on its severe metal corrosion
I guess air pollution in the parking area would need to be taken into account
lynn789 is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2011, 10:13
  #11 (permalink)  
TightYorksherMan
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Peak District
Age: 41
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
American Airlines are silver - always wondered whether that was the metal or the paint!
Jinkster is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2011, 14:29
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: France - mostly
Age: 84
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
American Airlines has an unpainted fuselage fleet, but polishes their aircraft to keep them bright and shiny.
That policy means that the sheet metal used for the manufacture of their airplanes is made to special order, and expensive measures apply to protect those skins during manufacture.

Regards,
HN39
HazelNuts39 is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2011, 00:34
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That policy means that the sheet metal used for the manufacture of their airplanes is made to special order, and expensive measures apply to protect those skins during manufacture.
The only "special skins" American Airlines required were those used on their A300-600's because Airbus does not used Alclad skins. If you look back their first AA A300's were painted gray and looked like c..p. American made Airbus change to Alclad skins for the remainder of their order.

Boeing uses Alclad skins on all their models (except the 787), regardless if they are polished or painted.

All aircraft skins are protected during the manufacturing process to prevent scratches as scratches can lead to corrosion and or fatigue cracks.

Lots of information on Alclad aluminum on the web but basically it is a thin layer of pure aluminum applied to both sides of aluminum sheets. The pure aluminum makes up approximately 10% of the total sheet thickness and provides corrosion protection.
glhcarl is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.