PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Forgotten your Username/Password?

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 23rd Mar 2010, 10:38   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 37
Q400 Pilots

Can anyone please give me some insight into the average fuel flow rates for takeoff and cruise for the dash 8 q400. Even better would be a mid cruise weight for a standard length flight.

Thanks
jhurditch is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Mar 2010, 11:37   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 71
Fuel flow rates for Take off can vary, the lowest reduced power take off setting (81% TQ) will be quite different from a Normal Take off (90% TQ).

Also for cruise, it varies if you use High speed cruise/intermediate speed cruise, also dependant on gross weight, ISA deviation etc.

For example at 22,000kgs at intermediate speed cruise, total fuel flow will be around 840Kgs/hr, at 28,000Kgs, high speed cruise it will be approx 1100Kgs/Hr.

Send me a PM if you want and I can look up the exact figures from the AFM later.
Piece of Cake is online now   Reply
Old 23rd Mar 2010, 14:04   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hang on, let me check the FMS...
Posts: 168
Peice of Cake's figures seem pretty accurate, as a rule of thumb on the line, 1000kg/hr for your average flight. (T/O, cruise, appr and landing)
FlyingTinCans is offline   Reply
Old 24th Mar 2010, 00:34   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 37
Thanks mate, that helps a lot. The thing is I don't have any off the documents. Im doing A/C engineering at Uni and am trying to find the CL of the aircraft. Maybe you can tell me some more things if you are aware of them off the top of your head. What would your indicated airspeed be at your most average cruise altitude and most average cruise mode (i.e fast, intermediate, etc).

Cheers mate
jhurditch is offline   Reply
Old 24th Mar 2010, 22:20   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 71
Off the top of my head,

We cruise at FL240 or 250, the Indicated Airspeed will be around 245-250 knots, this gives a true Airspeed around 360 Knots or ~M.59. It varies a little bit on weight and ISA deviation. This is using high speed cruise, which we use most of the time unless we have good tailwinds or are ahead of schedule when we will then use intermediate speed cruise.

If you need any tech info on the aircraft systems

SmartCockpit - Dash-8 400

is a good website.

If you need anything else, just ask.
Piece of Cake is online now   Reply
Old 25th Mar 2010, 01:12   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 37
Thanks heaps mate, Could you by any chance tell me what a mid cruise weight would be on say, a standard flight. I just need average numbers, does not need to be precise.

Cheers
jhurditch is offline   Reply
Old 25th Mar 2010, 03:36   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 434
jhurditch

A mid cruise weight could be anything, so many variables due to passenger loads and fuel loading that any figure given would be arbitrary.

A simple rule of thumb would be a basic weight of 18,000kg, fuel anything from lets say 2,000kg to 4,000kg (you did say mid-cruise, and assuming we've burned some off already), and then a rule of thumb for passenger/baggage weights we use to guestimate what weight we'd be when tanking fuel would be for every 10 passengers you would have on board 1,000kg.

So for a flight with 50 passengers on board, fuel remaining of 3,000kg and a basic empty weight of 18,000kg you would have a cruise loading of

18,000kg
50/10 x 1,000 = 5,000kg
3,000kg

Total weight = 26,000kg

Hope this helps
Coffin Corner is offline   Reply
Old 26th Mar 2010, 12:34   #8 (permalink)

Supercharged PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: I wish I knew
Posts: 1,129
I was bored enough to actually make a note of the fuel flow figures yesterday:

TOW around 26,000kg (so cruise weight around 25.5 ish), FL240, canít remember the exact ISA deviation, but it was quite unremarkable.

At Vmo Ė 10 (around 245KIAS / 350KTAS) with FADEC in climb mode, total FF was 1180kg/hr. With FADEC selected to cruise it reduced to 1120. Reducing to Vmo-20 typically reduces FF to just over 1 tonne/hr, and 900kg/hr is quite achievable if you go on an economy run.

Fuel consumption on the Q400 seems to be remarkably consistent. Itís not unusual to fly the exact same route twice in the space of a few hours, and for the burns to within 10 or 15kg of each other.
G SXTY is online now   Reply
Old 28th Mar 2010, 11:18   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 37
G SXTY, you are a life saver. Thanks for the efforts here.

On another note, do you find the aircraft to be close coupled?

Cheers
jhurditch is offline   Reply
Old 29th Mar 2010, 20:27   #10 (permalink)

Supercharged PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: I wish I knew
Posts: 1,129
Could you expand the question? Sorry to sound thick, but I just drive it.

I find it a handful if that helps.
G SXTY is online now   Reply
Old 30th Mar 2010, 13:31   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 37
I understand it to mean a number of different things. I believe structurally it described the distance from the main wing to the tail and how the inertial forced are thus created from this configuration. In more simple terms I take it to me how nice the aircraft feels to fly in terms of obedience in roll, pitch and yaw from inputs.

I suppose I am asking if the a/c is co operative or needs a fair bit of work on your part to do what you want it to aerodynamically.

Cheers
jhurditch is offline   Reply
Old 30th Mar 2010, 14:43   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 434
jhurditch

The Q400 is reasonably challenging to fly accurately manually, but by no means impossible (obviously), I try to keep the raw data and hand flying skills up as much as possible.
The pitch/roll couple is not in equilibrium, i.e. it is far more sensitive in pitch than it is in roll at high dynamic pressures where there seems to be alot of roll inertia, but a fair bit of pitch inertia at low dynamic pressures (slow; vref).

The yaw couple is the bane of Q400 pilots lives , any power change and there is a yaw change, the yaw couple is quite large and seems to vary from a/c to a/c, i.e. some are worse than others.
Coffin Corner is offline   Reply
Old 30th Mar 2010, 15:25   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dry bar
Posts: 341
Basically what he's saying is, is that it fly's as bad as it looks

shaun ryder is offline   Reply
Old 30th Mar 2010, 23:41   #14 (permalink)

Supercharged PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: I wish I knew
Posts: 1,129
That's pretty much it.

Great engines, great fuel economy - handling can be interesting.
G SXTY is online now   Reply
Old 2nd Apr 2010, 16:39   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Correr es mi destino por no llevar papel
Posts: 1,266
Quote:
it fly's as bad as it looks
I beg to differ.

She looks far, far better than she flies. She's quite heavy in pitch, difficult to trim (not impossible, though) and YD is a joke - rudder and trim is the way to play even with AP engaged.
Clandestino is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Apr 2010, 20:09   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 71
The old adage, if it looks right it flys right....
My wife says it looks like a stick insect and I think it handles like a tractor.

What it does well is that it takes a fair amount of passengers, is relatively quick and uses not much fuel.

If you want to know what it is like to fly, here is a link to a flight test from flightglobal:

Quiet revolution-25/04/2000-Flight International
Piece of Cake is online now   Reply
Old 2nd Apr 2010, 22:02   #17 (permalink)
BarbiesBoyfriend
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
An accountants' aircraft.

Not a pilots'.

I take my hat off to those who fly it.

Saw a Baboo one land at LCY the other day and I swear, I've never seen a more alarming (or rapid) pre-touchdown rotation.

'Orrible!
  Reply
Old 4th Apr 2010, 10:34   #18 (permalink)

Supercharged PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: I wish I knew
Posts: 1,129
Stick insect Ė I like it!

That Flight article neatly sums up the aircraft, and itís interesting that most of its deficiencies are immediately obvious on a quick test flight.

Shame really, as itís close to being a great aeroplane Ė if only Bombardier could have spent a bit more development cash on it, or better still started with a clean sheet of paper.

As it is, itís compromised both ergonomically - due to commonality with the earlier Dashes - and in aerodynamic and handling terms, courtesy of the stretch. Still, thereís never a dull moment flying it.
G SXTY is online now   Reply
Old 7th Apr 2010, 13:40   #19 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 37
Piece of Cake,

Thanks for the article. Very very helpful. Does this noise canceling work or is it a bit of a gimmick?
jhurditch is offline   Reply
Old 9th Apr 2010, 11:26   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 71
The noise cancelling (NVS) works up to a point. The first time I flew on the aircraft on a familiarisation flight before I did my training on it, I said to the cabin crew "I thought the Q400 was suppsoed to be quiet, is the NVS switched on...?" "oh yes" she said "let me show you what it's like with with it switched off..." The noise levels with it switched off are enough to make your ears bleed (almost). So it does work.

Having said that, compared to the other turboprop which I flew as well (328). The Q400 was noisier inside with the NVS switched on than the 328 which has no NVS at all. Also flew on an ATR 42-500 (as a passenger) recently and it was quieter then the Q400 as well. The Dash 8-300 is noisier though. (Don't know about the Q300 though as have never been in one).

The Q400 also has quite high noise levels in the flightdeck as the wipers create quite a lot of airflow noise aound them, and they sometimes make a strange whistling noise when flying through cloud.

Good luck with your uni course, if you need any photos of any bits of the aircraft let me know and I can email them.
Piece of Cake is online now   Reply
Reply
 
 
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 15:49.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network